The Criminal Arrogance of Hillary Clinton

Dear Congressman X:

Hillary Clinton is flagrantly and undeniably in violation of United States Code, 2006 Edition, Supplement 5, Title 18 – CRIMES AND CRIMINAL PROCEDURE.

Here’s the direct link to the law, available to you on the U.S. Government Printing Office’s website.

The only legal, sane, legitimate, rational, and correct recourse of action is to fine her, imprison her, and bar her from holding any office under the United States as required by federal law.

Specifically, her crimes, first of using a personal e-mail server, then wiping that server clean, directly violate:

§ 2071. Concealment, removal, or mutilation generally
(a) Whoever willfully and unlawfully conceals,
removes, mutilates, obliterates, or destroys, or
attempts to do so, or, with intent to do so takes
and carries away any record, proceeding, map,
book, paper, document, or other thing, filed or
deposited with any clerk or officer of any court
of the United States, or in any public office, or
with any judicial or public officer of the United
States, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned
not more than three years, or both.
(b) Whoever, having the custody of any such
record, proceeding, map, book, document, paper,
or other thing, willfully and unlawfully conceals,
removes, mutilates, obliterates, falsifies,
or destroys the same, shall be fined under this
title or imprisoned not more than three years,
or both; and shall forfeit his office and be disqualified
from holding any office under the
United States.

We the People KNOW THE LAW. I implore you and the rest of Congress ACT on the facts at hand without any further politicking or other delay.


If you’d like to look directly at the law that clearly indicates she committed two felonies, as well as the mandatory minimum punishment that’s required for her egregious behavior, look no further (click on it to see the full-sized copy):

US Code Title 18 Section 2071

Bill Whittle agrees:


2018 UPDATE:

In recent weeks, Hillary Clinton has engaged in encouraging insurrection among Demoncraps by encouraging “incivility.”  She doesn’t care that some people take it too far and roundhouse kick women and their phones, or worse, openly call for the assassination of government officials.  The fact that she knowingly continues to call for “incivility” in the face of the actual consequences renders her party to the results.

So what exactly are these results?

I’d call it “insurrection.” Revolutions are usually done by a majority and for good cause. Here’s the full scale:
Resistance could be just about anything done in defiance and opposition to something. Generally speaking it is about holding back further encroachment and turning back what already has occurred. Related terms might include decolonize. It could be overt or more subversive. Examples could include sabotaged rail lines leading to a new coal exporting terminal, blockading of a gas pipeline, tree sits, rewilding, or student occupations.
Rebellion is more generalized, and also tends to be reactionary in nature. It can include acts of resistance, but it can also be more visceral (I talked about this a bit more in the answer to the question you linked to above. It could be a group thing, or an individual thing.
Insurrection is a widespread movement against the dominant power, against the government. Its original meaning – “insurgere” = to rise against – was an uprising against a usurper, illegitimate government. Usually involves the use of violence and has a short period of time, otherwise it leads to a revolution – which is a premise – or is quickly extinguished.
Revolt is a moment of not just refusal but of actually striking back. The first intifada, or the slave uprising led by Nat Turner could be examples of this.
Revolution is an overturning of things and replacing the old order with a new one. Generally there is a plan and an agenda on the part of revolutionaries. The American War of Independence, the Russian Revolution, and the Arab Spring as it played out in Egypt and Libya could be looked at as examples of this.
From a legal standpoint, particularly here in the United States, the prohibition on rebellion and insurrection arises in a brief passage found in 18 U.S. Code, Section 2383. The law prohibits the incitement, assistance, and participation in a rebellion or insurrection against the authority of the United States and its laws. The punishment for this crime is a fine, a maximum sentence of 10 years in federal prison, and ineligibility for public office.
Rebellion and insurrection refer specifically to acts of violence against the state or its officers. This distinguishes the crime from sedition, which is the organized incitement to rebellion or civil disorder against the authority of the state. It also separates the crime from treason, which is the violation of allegiance owed to one’s country by betrayal or acting to aid the country’s enemies.
Bottom Line: What the Demoncraps are doing, including Hillary Clinton’s encouragement of “incivility,” is ILLEGAL and renders her INELIGIBLE for public office, not to mention the fine and a maximum sentence of 10 years.

One thought on “The Criminal Arrogance of Hillary Clinton

Leave a Reply