“…a nation where they will not be judged by the color of their skin, but by the content of their character.” – Martin Luther King
The 2014 elections are by far the most important elections to date of this century. Despite governmental reassurances to the contrary, America is tottering over the brink of economic collapse. Vote wrong, and we most certainly will lose. Vote right, and we might be able to haul her back from the edge.
As a registered Independent, I spent all afternoon Sunday reviewing not only the positions, but also the voting records of all 21 positions (42 candidates — half Republican, half Democrat) on my ballot. Given my “preaching” here on Facebook, I wanted to be absolutely certain I was electing the best candidate for each position, and not just “voting party line.”
I based my decisions mostly on their voting records. The criteria was simple: Had they supported and defended the Constitution, “the supreme Law of the Land,” as per their oaths of office? Or were they perverting our government by actions which undermined our Constitution and the rights and freedoms it recognizes and protects?
It was close in only 5 of the 21 open positions. The other 16 positions were slam-dunks.
In ALL cases, however, the records of the Republican candidates made it clear they stood for our rights and freedoms, while the records of the Democrat candidates made it clear they stood for bigger government at the EXPENSE of our rights and freedoms.
Sunday’s exercise was yet another of countless confirmations that the Democrat Party itself is no longer American, that it has been usurped by a mix of communists, fascists, socialists, muslims, opportunists and just plain idiots, to be used solely for the purpose of pulling the wool over the eyes of mostly lower to middle-class voters in order to remain in power, raise taxes, and siphon off a great deal of our hard-earned tax dollars into their own pockets and those of their friends.
To be fair, some Republicans are doing this, too, but I continually find they’re doing so to a far lesser extent.
Bottom line: I remain an Independent voter, yet cast all my votes towards the Republicans. My decisions were not based on the color of their party, but on the content of their character.
I’ll leave you with one last observation. Five years of digging into what goes on behind the curtains in both parties have lead me to conclude what the Democrats say about the Republicans are largely lies, often made up on the spot, and that the elements in the following graphic are largely true:
Martin Luther King, Jr. was a Republican, not a Democrat, and for many very good reasons which are even more sound today than they were back then.
Islam takes yet ANOTHER stab at stealing the souls of our children:
“As the department’s first Muslim captain, he said, he feels he can inspire young Muslims to join the force and serve as an
ambassador for a faith that is often viewed negatively.”
This sounds so nice, doesn’t it? Until you realize Muslims are getting away with proselytizing our youth, when Christians
can no longer pray, witness, or otherwise share their face in the public schools.
So, this will be allowed for no other reason than the fact that its Islam?
Who else sees the heinous preferential treatment being given to Islam? “Congress shall make law respecting an establishment
of religion…” Translating the vernacular of that day into ours, this means, “Congress shall make no law giving preferential treatment of one religion over another.” The term “respecting” in that day meant “holding in high esteem.” An establishment of religion could have Quakerism, Methodist, etc. If Congress passed any law holding one denomination in high esteem, without doing the same to others, they would have been giving them preferential treatment.
Meanwhile, SCOTUS long ago held that the term “Congress” should be expanded in scope to include “any Office or public Trust
under the United States,” as given in Article VI’s “no religious test” for public office.”
Taken together, they mean one thing: You cannot either select or disqualify a person for “any Office or public Trust under the United States” on the basis of their religious beliefs, but NEITHER can they or their office be “respecting an establishment of religion.”
Neither the Boston Police Chief nor anyone in “any Office or public Trust under the United States” can legally “be an
ambassador for Islam” or any other religion or creed.
That is not merely “the law,” it is “the supreme Law of the Land.”
Violating it means he would be violating his oath of
office to “support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies foreign and domestic.” It means the
Boston Police Chief would be making himself a domestic enemy of the United States of America.
Boston police Captain Haseeb Hosein is violating the law. He is thumbing his nose at the Constitution while attempting to
indoctrinate (brainwash) our Children about Islam.DO NOT LET THIS HAPPEN!
DO, however, recall that headlines in countries where Islam has exceeded certain levels usually read like this:
Muslims killing Muslims: Syrian Shia child who watched parents killed has her heart cut out
Woman stoned for refusing to have sex with her husband
Teenagers hung for being gay
Public school teachers conduct field trip to Mosque where they force students to learn Muslim prayers while kneeling and bowing their heads to Allah
Women and children slaughtered “just because”
Christians slaughtered for refusing to pay jizya
This greatest question is this: If Boston police Captain Haseeb Hosein is willing to toss the Constitution out the window
on something as important as our First Amendment, what will he do when it comes to our Second Amendment? How about the
Fourth Amendment? Any others? The Constitution itself?
“Whoever can be trusted with very little can also be trusted with much, and whoever is dishonest with very little will also
be dishonest with much.” – Jesus, in Luke 16:10.
Boston police Captain Haseeb Hosein has NOT been honest, in either very little or much. He can NOT be trusted in either.
The question is, what Muslim can? The entire written foundation of their faith, the Qu’ran and the Hadith, dictate they MUST override all other religions and promote Islam above all others. Islam is NOT compatible with the very essence of the United States of America.
Islam is an ABOMINATION in the eyes of the one and only true God, and his name is NOT “allah.”
While reading Newt on Benghazi, I realized there’s a lot more to this story. It’s far worse than the fact four Americans died.
It’s the fact they didn’t have to die. It’s the fact that the man sitting in the White House is masquerading as a U.S. President. It’s the fact that he got there through massive fraud and deceit, including rampant voter fraud. It’s the fact that he conspired with our enemies to kidnap a U.S. Ambassador. It’s the fact that when things went sour, instead of scrapping the plan and rescuing those he’d put in harm’s way, he not only LET them die, he went out of his way to ensure they received no help whatsoever. It’s the fact that in so doing, he was already covering up, even as they were dying. It’s the fact that he fired four General Officers, each of whom had more integrity in their little finger than he’s ever known throughout the entire half-century of his life, as a warning to others.
It’s the fact this only BEGINS to crack the surface of his hundreds of high crimes and misdemeanors, each of which quality for impeachment and jail time, if not a death sentence for being a traitor. It’s the fact that, taken together, they are so incredibly damning that the only reason he wasn’t sentenced long ago is because half of Congress is COMPLICIT due to their refusal to do their duty and impeach him.
It’s the fact that WE THE PEOPLE have had ENOUGH.
He does NOT represent us. He does NOT represent America. He was NOT born in America.
The long answer is that mainstream media tried to pull the wool over America’s eyes yet again. Every one of them ran a story or held an interview with some “expert” who said the culprits were either “white supremacists,” “right-wing extremists,” “members of some militia,” or “some fringe element.”
“And the survey says!” XXX, XXX, XXX, and XXX.
NONE of them ventured that it might actually be *GASP!!!* Muslims.
The correct answer is Chechen extremists, almost certainly Islamic. Chechnya has 1.2 million people. They speak Russian and Chechen.
“Islam is the predominant religion in Chechnya. Chechens are overwhelmingly adherents to Sunni Islam, the country having converted to Islam between the 16th and the 19th centuries.” – Wikipedia
“Sunni Islam is sometimes referred to as the orthodox version of the religion.” – Wikipedia
“The primary collections consisting of Kutub al-Sittah accepted by Sunni orthodoxy, in conjunction with the Quran and binding consensus, form the basis of all jurisprudence within Sunni Islam. Laws are derived from these basic sources…” – Wikipedia
Bottom Line: They follow Muhammad’s Hadiths, the Quran, and a “binding consensus” for all issues not directly addressed therein.
If you’re at all familiar with the Hadiths and the Quran with respect to where we Americans stand, the short answer is: CONVERT OR DIE.
State-sponsored socialism has many names. Regardless of whether you call it Naziism, fascism, Leninism, Marxism, communism, Islamism, or Obamaism, they all have a huge downside: Human extermination i.e Genocide. It follows a three-step pattern:
1. Registration – identifies those who will soon be disarmed.
2. Disarm the people so they can’t resist the armed police state.
3. Exterminate all who are either a burden to or a resistor of the police state.
By the way, extermination isn’t limited to only those who owned firearms. In fact, extermination has
historically been visited primarily on the poor, as they’re the greatest burden on the state. All those promises of “we’ll take care of you!” during the elections only last long enough for socialists to secure their stronghold in the government. That’s when the masses start dying.
Extermination is then extended to the III% who would refuse to knuckle under and who stand against the massacre no matter what. In the 20th Century alone, socialism exterminated 135 million humans, according to the U.S. Congressional Record. The vast majority of those were NOT dissidents, but merely the poor, who could not exist without handouts from the state. Most were relocated away from their farming tools, where they simply starved.
African Americans originally came to America unwillingly, having been stolen and sold by Muslim slave-catchers in Africa to Dutch traders journeying to America in 1619.
The Three-Fifths Clause dealt only with representation and not the worth of any individual.
In 1857, a Democratically controlled Supreme Court delivered the Dred Scott decision, declaring that blacks were not persons or citizens but instead were property and therefore had no rights.
The 13th Amendment to abolish slavery was voted for by 100% of the Republicans in congress and by 23% of the Democrats in congress.
Not one Democrat either in the House or the Senate voted for the 14th amendment declaring that former slaves were full citizens of the state in which they lived and were therefore entitled to all the rights and privileges of any other citizen in that state.
Not a single one of the 56 Democrats in Congress voted for the 15th amendment that granted explicit voting rights to black Americans.
In 1866 Democrats formed the Ku Klux Klan to pave the way for Democrats to regain control in the elections.
George Wallace was a Democrat.
Bull Connor was a Democrat.
In the 19th century, Democrats prevented Black Americans from going to public school.
In the 20th and 21st century Democrats prevented Black Americans trapped in failing schools from choosing a better school. In fact Democrats voted against the bill by 99%.
Jim Crow laws, poll taxes, grandfather clauses, Literacy tests, white only primaries, and physical violence all came from the Democratic Party.
Between 1882 and 1964, 4,743 individuals were lynched. 3,446 blacks and 1,297 whites. Republicans often led the efforts to pass federal anti-lynching laws and Democrats successfully blocked those bills.
Martin Luther King, Jr. was a Republican. His father, Daddy King was a Republican.
Though both the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and the Voting Rights Act of 1965 were signed into law under Democrat President, Lyndon Johnson, it was the Republicans in Congress who made it possible in both cases – not to overlook the fact that the heart of both bills came from the work of Republican President Dwight D. Eisenhower.
In the 108th Congress, when Republicans proposed a permanent extension of the 1965 Voting Rights Act, it was opposed by the Congressional Black Caucus (composed only of Democrats).
Following the Civil War, Frederick Douglass received Presidential appointments from Republican Presidents Ulysses Grant, Rutherford B. Hayes, and James A. Garfield. Democratic President Grover Cleveland removed Frederick Douglas from office but Republican President Benjamin Harrison reappointed him.
Very few today know that in 1808 Congress abolished the slave trade. Although slavery still had not been abolished in all the states, things definitely were moving in the right direction.
By 1820, most of the Founding Fathers were dead and Thomas Jefferson’ party (the Democratic Party) had become the majority party in Congress.
In 1789, the Republican controlled Congress passed the Northwest Ordinance that prohibited slavery in a federal territory. In 1820, the Democratic Congress passed the Missouri Compromise and reversed that earlier policy, permitting slavery in almost half of the federal territories.
In 1850, Democrats in Congress passed the “Fugitive Slave Law”. That law required Northerners to return escaped slaves back into slavery or else pay huge fines.
Because the “Fugitive Slave Law” allowed Free Blacks to be carried into slavery, this law was disastrous for blacks in the North; and as a consequence of the atrocious provisions of this Democratic law, some 20,000 blacks in the North left the United States and fled to Canada.
The “Underground Railroad” reached the height of its activity during this period, helping thousands of slaves escape from slavery in the South all the way out of the United States and into Canada – simply to escape the reach of the Democrats’ Fugitive Slave Law.
In 1854, the Democratically controlled Congress passed another law strengthening slavery: the Kansas-Nebraska Act. Even though Democrats in Congress had already expanded the federal territories in which slavery was permitted through their passage of the Missouri Compromise, they had retained a ban on slavery in the Kansas-Nebraska territory. But through the Kansas-Nebraska Act, Democrats repealed those earlier restrictions, thus allowing slavery to be introduced into parts of the new territory where it previously had been forbidden.
Following the passage of these pro-slavery laws in Congress, in May of 1854, a number of the anti-slavery Democrats in Congress – along with some anti-slavery members from other political parties, including the Whigs, Free Soilers, and Emancipationists, formed a new political party to fight slavery and secure equal civil rights for black Americans. The name of that party? They called it the Republican Party because they wanted to return to the principles of freedom and equality first set forth in the governing documents of the Republic before pro-slavery members of Congress had perverted those original principles.
One of the founders of the Republican was U.S. Senator Charles Sumner. In 1856, Sumner gave a two day long speech in the U.S. Senate against slavery. Following that speech, Democratic Representative Preston Brooks from South Carolina came from the House, across the Rotunda of the Capitol, and over to the Senate where he literally clubbed down Sumner on the floor of the Senate, knocked him unconscious, and beat him almost to death. According to the sources of that day, many Democrats thought that Sumner’s clubbing was deserved, and it even amused them. What happened to Democrat Preston Brooks following his vicious attack on Sumner? He was proclaimed a southern hero and easily re-elected to Congress.
In 1856, the Republican Party entered its first Presidential election, running Republican John C. Fremont against Democrat James Buchanan. In that election, the Republican Party issued its first-ever Party platform. It was a short document with only nine planks in the platform, but significantly, six of the nine planks set forth bold declarations of equality and civil rights for African Americans based on the principles of the Declaration of Independence.
In 1856, the Democratic platform took a position strongly defending slavery and warned: “All efforts of the abolitionists… are calculated to lead to the most alarming and dangerous consequences and all such efforts have an inevitable tendency to diminish the happiness of the people”.
It is worth noting that for over a century and a half, Democrats often have taken a position that some human life is disposable – as they did in the Dred Scott decision. In that instance, a black individual was not a life, it was property; and an individual could do with his property as he wished. Today, Democrats have largely taken that same position on unborn human life – that an unborn human is disposable property to do with as one wishes.
African Americans were the victims of this disposable property ideology a century and a half ago, and still are today. Consider: although 12 percent of the current population is African American, almost 35 percent of all abortions are performed on African Americans. In fact, over the last decade, for every 100 African American live births, there were 53 abortions of African American babies. Democrats have encouraged this; and although black Americans are solidly pro-life with almost two-thirds opposing abortion on demand, a number of recent votes in Congress reveals that Democrats hold exactly the opposite view, with some 80 percent of congressional Democrats being almost rabidly pro-abortion and consistently voting against protections for innocent unborn human life.
Given the countless atrocities against blacks at the hands of the Democratic Party, please explain to me again why ANY African American today is a member?
Friends who would be your enemies if you did not give them your lunch money are not your friends. They’re you’re enemies! The only way to deal with a bully is to put him in his place.
I was bullied on a number of occasions growing up. When that happened, I tackled them, and sat on them until they cried, “Uncle!” After that, no more bully! At least not to me, anyway, and usually, no longer to others.
When a country or a religious group gets out of line and starts bullying ourselves or others, they need a swift kick in the pants. You don’t need to enter into a prolonged conflict on their soil. You just need to hit ’em hard and fast, while telling them “KNOCK IT OFF!” If they don’t listen, hit ’em again.
Sooner or later one of two things will happen: They’ll either knock it off, or they’ll declare war on us. If the latter, no matter. Doesn’t mean we need to go fight them on their own soil. That’s what they WANT us to do. We have superior intel and firepower, so, sit back and let ’em stew. They’ll either forget about it or will continue to “wage war” against us. If the latter, then impose and enforce trade sanctions. If they build something that’s bad, take it out. If they start waging ware on our soil, take them out.
Whatever you do, DO NOT give bullies your lunch money!
Sadly, our burden of Obamagrift runs into the TRILLIONS of U.S. dollars. He is fiscally raping our nation, and this must stop. What do you tell a rapist? You tell him “NO!”
Write your Congressman, whether they agree with you or not, and tell them “NO!” Write the President and tell him “NO!” Tell them, “It’s our country, and you can’t have it!” Tell them they’re not authorized to give it away, either. Be polite, but be firm, and never back down. Remember, ours is a government of the people, for the people, and by the people.
This only works, however, when WE THE PEOPLE stand up and take our country back from those who would run it into the ground.