If any of you might be thinking “our time of reckoning is at hand,” you’d be right.
The American People need to come to grips with something, and they’d better get it real quick, before their government takes away something they granted a long time ago.
Owning and carrying (that’s the “keep and bear” part) is NOT a “privilege.” We do NOT have a “Bill of Privileges.” We have a Bill of RIGHTS.
The Second Amendment, number two in the ten Amendments in our Bill of RIGHTS, reads as follows: “A well regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free state, the RIGHT of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.” (emphasis mine)
In February of 1982, the Subcommittee on the Constitution of the United States Senate, 97th Congress, Second Session, published document 88-618 0, entitled The Right to Keep and Bear Arms Report. Therein, you will find such quotes as:
“In my studies as an attorney and as a United States Senator, I have constantly been amazed by the indifference or even hostility shown the Second Amendment by courts, legislatures, and commentators.”
“James Madison would be startled to hear that his recognition of a right to keep and bear arms, which passed the House by a voice vote without objection and hardly a debate, has since been construed in but a single, and most ambiguous Supreme Court decision.”
“Thomas Jefferson, who kept a veritable armory of pistols, rifles and shotguns at Monticello, and advised his nephew to forsake other sports in favor of hunting, would be astounded to hear supposed civil libertarians claim firearm ownership should be restricted.”
“No fewer than twenty-one decisions by the courts of our states have recognized an individual right to keep and bear arms, and a majority of these have not only recognized the right but invalidated laws or regulations which abridged it. Yet in all too many instances, courts or commentators have sought, for reasons only tangentially related to constitutional history, to construe this right out of existence. They argue that the Second Amendment’s words “right of the people” mean “a right of the state” — apparently overlooking the impact of those same words when used in the First and Fourth Amendments. The “right of the people” to assemble or to be free from unreasonable searches and seizures is not contested as an individual guarantee. Still they ignore consistency and claim that the right to “bear arms” relates only to military uses. This not only violates a consistent constitutional reading of “right of the people” but also ignores that the second amendment protects a right to “keep” arms. These commentators contend instead that the amendment’s preamble regarding the necessity of a “well regulated militia . . . to a free state” means that the right to keep and bear arms applies only to a National Guard. Such a reading fails to note that the Framers used the term “militia” to relate to every citizen capable of bearing arms, and that the Congress has established the present National Guard under its own power to raise armies, expressly stating that it was not doing so under its power to organize and arm the militia.”
“In 2008 and 2010, the Supreme Court issued two landmark decisions concerning the Second Amendment. In District of Columbia v. Heller, 554 U.S. 570 (2008), the Court ruled that the Second Amendment protects an individual’s right to possess a firearm, unconnected to service in a militia and to use that arm for traditionally lawful purposes, such as self-defense within the home. In dicta, the Court listed many longstanding prohibitions and restrictions on firearms possession as being consistent with the Second Amendment. In McDonald v. Chicago, 561 U.S. 3025 (2010), the Court ruled that the Second Amendment limits state and local governments to the same extent that it limits the federal government.” – Wikipedia’s entry on “Second Amendment to the United States Constitution,” Dec 25, 2012.
The problem with the Supreme Court of the United States of America is that they are SO bogged down these days in precedent and legaleze from the many thousands of decisions rendered by them and the lower courts with respect to firearms, that they’re unable to see the forest through the trees. It’s a VERY SIMPLE forest, people, and it looks like this: “A well regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED.” (emphasis mine)
Thus, when the Supreme Court “listed many longstanding prohibitions and restrictions on firearms possession as being consistent with the Second Amendment,” were they infringing on “the right of the people to keep and bear arms?”
Hell yes, they were! Just as were the “many longstanding prohibitions and restrictions on firearms.” Put simply, U.S. Supreme Court, Congress, and Mr. President, what in the hell do you think “SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED” means, anyway? Here’s a clue: “infringe: 1
: to encroach upon in a way that violates law or the rights of another ”
By definition, ANY “prohibition” or “restriction” is an infringement. Therefore, it logically follows, by definition, that any ruling by the U.S. Supreme court which upholds an “prohibition” or “restriction” is also an infringement.
So, was the Supreme Court’s “Heller ruling which indicated that “traditionally lawful purposes” was restricted to “self-defense within the home” an infringement?
You bet your ass it was.
And was the Supreme Court’s “MacDonald” ruling which limited the powers of local and state governments an infringement?
No, of course not. The reason it wasn’t an infringement is simple: Our Founding Fathers, the ones who both founded this country, creating our Constitution and it’s Bill of Rights, NEVER wanted to EVER AGAIN see American citizens at the mercy of their government. Instead, they wanted American citizens to know, understand, and act upon just one thing: That the United States of America is a country of the people, by the people, and for the people.
This is why I founded RYOC – Run Your Own Country! It’s not our government’s country. It’s OUR country! WE THE PEOPLE are the ultimate authority in this great nation of ours, and it’s up to US to ensure our nation remains on the narrow path, the one upon which our Founding Fathers sent us, the one which lead to the greatest nation on Earth, and the only one which will get us out of this mess we’re in today.
How do we do that? Simple, and it takes just two steps:
First, stop drooling over politicians’ rhetoric. Look at their voting record, instead.
Second, vote ALL those who fail to adhere to our Constitution, the law of our land, out of office. Obama, H. Clinton, Pelosi, Steinfein, and Reed come to mind as the WORST offenders on this point. They just need to go.
That’s it! Continuing education, however, is critical. If you haven’t read our Constitution lately, please do. An initial read should take you no more than ten minutes. You can read it, as well as the other documents upon which our nation was founded, at the Library of Congress’ website, here: http://www.archives.gov/exhibits/charters/constitution.html Also, take a look at that Congressional Report. It was written thirty years ago, but it was never more applicable at any time between then and now than it is today.
Good luck, and God Bless!