Judge Mehta – Recuse Thyself!

In a May 15, 2019 article in The Independent, Judge Mehta is quoted as saying, “”Is it your position that whether the president has properly reported his finances (under federal disclosure laws), that’s not subject to investigation by Congress?”

Judge Mehta, THE UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION DECLARES President Trump’s finances are not subject to investigation by Congress.

BY LAW, Congress is NOT AN INVESTIGATIVE BODY. It is a LEGISLATIVE body, one with LIMITED oversight, and only over those specific matters as Constitutionally granted.

The President’s personal finances are NOT among those powers specifically or even derivatively granted to Congress.

You CAN NOT, Sir, add to the Constitution without a duly formed, voted, passed, approved, and ratified AMENDMENT.

Judge Mehta, you are now COMPLICIT with Democrats in Congress in USURPING the investigative authority of the Constitutionally-authorized and Congressionally/Presidentially-formed United States Department of Justice under whom the Federal Bureau of Investigation — which MOST CERTAINLY IS an investigative organization — has FULL INVESTIGATIVE AUTHORITY.


“The FBI’s mandate is established in Title 28 of the United States Code (U.S. Code), Section 533, which authorizes the Attorney General to “appoint officials to detect and prosecute crimes against the United States.”[54] Other federal statutes give the FBI the authority and responsibility to investigate specific crimes.”


“Information obtained through an FBI investigation is presented to the appropriate U.S. Attorney or Department of Justice official, who decides if prosecution or other action is warranted.”

In light of the above and your serious miscarriage of justice (or perhaps mere ignorance of reality in the U.S. Justice System?), We the People find you comments and actions HIGHLY QUESTIONABLE. Your comments indicate STRONG bias and predisposed favoritism to the Democrats in Congress, not to mention an incomprehensible misunderstanding of the Justice System of the United States of America.

It’s almost as if you either have little concept of how things work at all, or you’re attempting to SUBVERT the law by ignoring 4/5ths of the law in its entirety.

YOU, Sir, have FAILED to adhere to both your Federal and Judicial Oaths of Office. In so doing, you bring great discredit upon yourself and the United States Federal Judiciary.


Federal Judiciary Oaths (2):

“I, (name), do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will administer justice without respect to persons, and do equal right to the poor and to the rich, and that I will faithfully and impartially discharge and perform all the duties incumbent upon me as (office) under the Constitution and laws of the United States. [So help me God.]” – 28 U.S.C. § 453, Oaths of justices and judges.

The second oath is the same as required of Congress:

“I, (name), do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; that I take this obligation freely, without any mental reservation or purpose of evasion; and that I will well and faithfully discharge the duties of the office on which I am about to enter. [So help me God.]” – 5 U.S.C. § 3331, Oath of Office.

In light of the above, and after serious consideration, We the People of the United States of America do hereby call for your immediate and unconditional recusal.

Leave a Reply