Cryptocurrency Redux – AG Concerns

“U.S. Attorney General William P. Barr announced Thursday the release of “Cryptocurrency: An Enforcement Framework,” a roadmap for policing the cryptocurrency landscape.”

KNOWING that this plays right into Revelations 13, I have one question:


“Current terrorist use of cryptocurrency may represent the first raindrops of an oncoming storm of expanded use that could challenge the ability of the United States and its allies to disrupt financial resources that would enable terrorist organizations to more successfully execute their deadly missions or to expand their influence.”

COULD, people. COULD.

Then again, some brilliant but mislead high school student COULD manage to break a critical component of our infrastructure.

In the meantime, there remain two key concepts at play:

1. The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, SHALL NOT BE VIOLATED.

2. The government DOES NOT get to search through everyone’s stuff and make the determination of what may or may not have violated the law. For many outstanding reasons, that is an abundantly clear violation of Amendment IV to the Constitution for the United States of America. We the People retain FULL right of privacy to PREVENT that from happening in the first place.

Please refer to B. Legitimate Uses on Page 5 of your report.

LEST WE FORGET: “The second beast … also forced all people, great and small, rich and poor, free and slave, to receive a mark on their right hands or on their foreheads, so that they could not buy or sell unless they had the mark, which is the name of the beast or the number of its name. This calls for wisdom. Let the person who has insight calculate the number of the beast, for it is the number of a man. That number is 666.” – Revelations 13:15-18

I submit NO government “policing the cryptocurrency landscape” is either required or desired. It’s the same issue as with firearms. Just because someone COULD use them for harm doesn’t mean we allow the government to dictate to the other 99.97% who, what, where, why, how and when we can and cannot keep and bear arms. The Second Amendment exists for OUR protection, not only against “bad actors” but also against YOU. After all, “the right of the people to keep and bear arms SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED,” the SAME as “The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, SHALL NOT BE VIOLATED.”

OUR business. NOT YOURS. Our Constitution exists to keep YOUR noses out of OUR business.

Yes, Attorney General Barr, while I think you’ve done a fine job up until now, and support both you and President Trump in general, the support of We the People is NEVER a license to violate ANY of our Constitutional rights and freedoms REGARDLESS OF THE REASON.

That said, if our Constitution and its Amendments cannot handle the current foreign and domestic terrorism environments, then by all means, go through the proper channels, propose an Amendment modifying current checks and limitations on federal action and pass it in accordance with Article V of the Constitution.

Don’t be miffed. If we didn’t have these checks against government power, “bad actors” within the government itself would have taken over our country long ago just as Pelosi and the Demoncraps are attempting to do in modern times.

I submit to you that an internal coup side-stepping the Constitution is a greater threat to our nation as a whole, long-term, than terrorists flying airplanes into very tall and even very expensive buildings.

Everyone absolutely MUST play by the rules or not at all. This is our nation’s ULTIMATE safeguard hence our oath of office to “support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic.” Thus, I’m asking all involved with this project to please “bear true faith and allegiance to the same.”

Thank you.

Original Article

PS: If you like to greatly help our nation, go after Pelosi for her role Russia gate, Impeachment-gate, and now, Twenty-Fifth Amendment-gate. What Pelosi is saying the 25th Amendment says is NOT what the 25th Amendment actually says! The House has ABSOLUTELY ZERO authority to remove a President without the Vice President’s written authorization AND two-thirds vote of both the House of Representatives AND the Senate.

IN FACT, Congress is NOT AUTHORIZED to act on this matter without the Vice President initiating it.

Updated: October 10, 2020 — 12:49 am