Obamites Try Saving Obama’s Sinking Legacy

A blithering idiot recently said, “Last I checked, Obama did not bankrupt our country… We are not in a recession… We have strong job growth… and we have lower oil prices…. but yeah we have to constantly hear racist remarks, hes muslim, hes a terrorist… We are a LOT BETTER than we were in January 20 2009.”
Doubling the national debt from $9 trillion to more than $19 trillion constitutes bankruptcy. That happened THROUGHOUT Obama’s administration. That IS Obama’s legacy, along with countless other political and social gaffs that have resurrected racial tensions throughout America from their 1970s ashes, hobbled economic growth, and greatly harmed our nation as a whole.  Those of you who believe otherwise are living in a dream world, one measured not by facts, rational thought, sound reasoning and good judgement, but by how sweet-sounding you can make your idiotic rhetoric sound to one another.  You are, in every Biblical sense of the definition, fools.  You cannot save Obama’s sinking legacy with the same rhetoric that doomed you from the start.
We are NOT better than we were back in January 20,2009. In fact, we were poised to exit a relatively minor recession very quickly. Obama’s blitheringly idiotic and rather Keynesian economic policies GREATLY prolonged our recovery by filtering the people’s money via taxes through the highly inefficient and grossly sub-par rate of return (about 70% below the break-even point of 1.0) instead of allowing the people to keep those funds and use them as they saw fit, rebuilding their businesses, paying rent – whatever was needed. Those funds, injected directly into the economy by millions of consumers making good, economic choices right for them has always had a FAR greater and more positive effect on the nation’s economy as a whole than ANY government funded program, much less a government-funded “recovery.”
In fact, your comment underscores the primary problem of Demoncraps and Libtards: You always claim every positive thing as a victory for your cause without having the SLIGHTEST freaking clue as to its source, much less the nature of cause an effect. I’ll bet if you found a penny in the street, you’d say, “Thanks, Obama!” but if you stepped in poo you’d blame it on Bush and Trump.” It’s idiots like you that got us into our current and horrific brink of disaster mess by voting for other idiots like Obama and the Demoncrap half of Congress who haven’t the slightest clue about economics, much less how to turn a nation a strong world competitor-partner.
I don’t know of a nicer way to put it than to say, “You Demoncraps and libtards suck. You don’t have slightest clue as to what you’re talking about or what you’re doing. You’ve made a horrible mess of things, and anything positive that’s happened over the last eight years has occurred IN SPITE OF your idiotic gyrations, not because of them. It’s time for you to SHUT UP and use the next eight years to study REALITY for a change. You tried idealism, and look where it got us? Yeah. So shut up, already.”
Meanwhile, the economy — including both the stock market as well as a huge influx of new jobs — surged away from Obama’s sinking legacy immediately AFTER Trump won. Obama’s fudged low unemployment FAILS to count any of the unprecedented number (>50%) of non-employed workers throughout the United States. Read up on the BLS website for U1-U6. None of them count workers who have given up working for jobs, often moving in with friends or family, because there are no jobs or other options. NOW we have jobs. NOW they have options. AFTER Obama, in the TRUMP era.
No, Trump is no God. He’s certainly not perfect, either. But as a highly successful multi-corporate Chief Executive Officer, Trump has repeatedly demonstrated he has what it takes — including the smarts — to lead the Chief Executive Office of these United States by hiring the right collection of experts who are not cronies and who stand the greatest probability of actually fixing many of America’s many problems.
You had your chance with Obama.  He blew it.
It’s our turn, and if you would please, children, get and keep your God-damned fingers out of the pie.
In the meantime, here’s a little history lesson for the blithering idiots:

“Back in the 1960s and 1970s, Milton Friedman challenged the Keynesians over how monetary policy works. (John Maynard Keynes was dead, so did not directly argue the point.) Keynesians viewed stimulative monetary policy as helping the economy through lower interest rates, which increased spending by consumers and businesses.

“Friedman’s masterpiece study A Monetary History of the United States, 1867-1960 convinced him that they driver was money supply growth rather than interest rates.

“Friedman won the battle, and monetary policy was accepted by most economists as a money supply matter. During the recent recession, however some younger members of the profession [including Obama and his advisors] rediscovered old-fashioned Keynesianism.”

Source:  Conerly, B. (2012).  Keynes vs. Friedman at the Fed.  Forbes.  Retrieved from:  http://www.forbes.com/sites/billconerly/2012/03/08/keynes-vs-friedman-at-the-fed/#47d57e6016e4

Obama, ISIS and ISIL

Whenever Obama says “ISIL” he is doing it as a face-slap to Israel.
The “L” in ISIL stands for “Levant” which is an ancient term for the entire area, including Palestine and Israel. Because he is aligned with ISIS, he will NEVER say “ISIS.” It will always be “ISIL”.
FYI: “The Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant (ISIL), also known as the Islamic State of Iraq and Syria (ISIS), Islamic State (IS), and by its Arabic language acronym Daesh, is a Salafi jihadist unrecognized state and militant group that follows a fundamentalist, Wahhabi doctrine of Sunni Islam. Its adoption of the name Islamic State and its idea of a caliphate have been widely criticized, with the United Nations, various governments, and mainstream Muslim groups rejecting its statehood.”
Also: “The Levant is an approximate historical geographical term referring to a large area in the eastern Mediterranean. In its widest historical sense, the Levant included all of the eastern Mediterranean with its islands, that is, it included all of the countries along the eastern Mediterranean shores, extending from Greece to Cyrenaica.”
Put simply, the Levant includes the following countries and regions:
– Cyprus
– Israel
– Iraq
– Jordan
– Lebanon
– Palestine
– Syria
– Turkey
The area includes a myriad of languages:
– Levantine Arabic
– Hebrew
– Aramaic
– Armenian
– Circassian
– Greek
– Kurdish
– Ladino
– Turkish
By continuing to use the term “ISIL,” Obama and the Mudstream Idia (Idiotic Media) is intentionally recognizing the claim ISIS makes over the entire Levant, rather than merely Iraq and Syria (ISIS).
When you get to the crux of the matter, Obama is backing the claim of ISIS over Israel, something NO Christian would EVER do.
Obama is NOT a Christian. He may not be Satan incarnate, but he’s certainly one of his deceived minions.

Obama, Hillary, and the Demoncrap Party: Revelations’ Number of the Beast?

My Friend, methinks you’re not understanding the nature of the situation.
Many competent psychologists have stepped forward, examined the empirical evidence, including her many statements, her testimony before Congress, the e-mails she sent from her own personal/private account, various paperwork. and eyewitness testimony of many who’ve been in her immediate presence for extended periods of time on numerous occasions, and have come to precisely the same conclusion as have many astute observers in the general public: She is a pathological liar, involving the “falsification entirely disproportionate to any discernible end in view, may be extensive and very complicated, and may manifest over a period of years or even a lifetime. The individual may be aware they are lying, or may believe they are telling the truth.”
By “empirical evidence,” I am referring to “the knowledge or source of knowledge acquired by means of the senses, particularly by observation and experimentation. Empirical evidence is information that justifies a belief in the truth or falsity of a claim. In the empiricist view, one can claim to have knowledge only when one has a true belief based on empirical evidence. This stands in contrast to the rationalist view under which reason or reflection alone is considered evidence for the truth or falsity of some propositions. The senses are the primary source of empirical evidence. Although other sources of evidence, such as memory and the testimony of others, ultimately trace back to some sensory experience, they are considered secondary, or indirect. In science, empirical evidence is required for a hypothesis to gain acceptance in the scientific community. Normally, this validation is achieved by the scientific method of hypothesis commitment, experimental design, peer review, adversarial review, reproduction of results, conference presentation, and journal publication. This requires rigorous communication of hypothesis (usually expressed in mathematics), experimental constraints and controls (expressed necessarily in terms of standard experimental apparatus), and a common understanding of measurement.”
So you see, My Friend, no small amount of examination of Hillary Clinton has been accomplished in these experts coming forth and attesting to the fact that she is indeed a pathological liar.
The fact that she has lied a very great deal to both Congress and the American public was clearly established by testimony of FBI Director Comey, not only in the midst of his press release that while regretably not recommending charges, but thankfully clearly citing at least some of Hillary’s many criminal actions, but more appropriately in subsequent and sworn testimony before Congress wherein he absolutely and without question highlighted Hillary’s great and many lies.
The thing about operations of this magnitude, however, is that even far smaller operations leave trails of both information and money, and such trails tell an unambiguous story not only of lies, but of cheating and stealing an incredible sum of $5.1 BILLION from the American people, hundreds of millions of which were routed to the Clintons’ pockets via the Clinton Foundation and Clinton Global Initiative, almost always in exchange for highly questionable if not outright illegal political favors given to those who were either paying exorbitant sums ($750,000) for their speeches or “contributing” to their money-laundering “organizations.”
The handwriting isn’t merely on the wall (Daniel 5), My Friend. The paint is now three feet thick, sagging, and bleeding under its own weight. Yet “The god of this age has blinded the minds of unbelievers, so that they cannot see the light of the gospel that displays the glory of Christ, who is the image of God.” – 2 Cor 4:4
In the old days this was limited to simple matters, such as the Gospel itself, along with the nature and role of the Pharisees, Sadducees, and principalities and powers of this world. But Satan has so convoluted the issues that the minds of many of the elect (saved by grace through faith) have also been deceived, not about the light of the gospel, but about seriously and severe involvement in demonic forces.
The litmus test is simple: Put away all all preconceived notions of all parties and ask this one simple question: Who is lying? Who is lying to the American people? Who lied to the FBI? Who lied to Congress? Who was fired from the Watergate investigations because of her gross ethical violations? Who has a forty year long track record of lying, lying, lying, lying, lying?
What does God hate? It’s lying lips (Proverbs 12:22: “The LORD detests lying lips, but he delights in people who are trustworthy.”) and lying tongues (Proverbs 12:19: “Truthful lips endure forever, but a lying tongue lasts only a moment.”)
The question is, am I trustworthy? I’d like to think so. I was saved by grace, through faith in Jesus Christ my Lord and Savior when I was 15 years old in a Baptist Church in Slidell, Louisiana. I’d been attending church and youth groups at a Presbyterian church off and on for several years, but I’d never heard a clear presentation of the Gospel of Jesus Christ. When I did that one summer afternoon, the Holy Spirit confirmed in my heart that the testimony I was hearing from many others was true and from God Almighty.  Although my conversion is real, I willingly admit I am no Billy Graham.  Although I tried to be the best husband and father I could be, I was not.  Although I never violated the marriage bed, I struggled in other areas.  Although I always sought to lead and love my son in the path of our Lord and Savior Jesus Christ, it has often been in ways that were more worldly than saintly.

I know that.  They know that.  And although I am no longer married to the love of my life and mother of our child, we remain good friends.  I am helping her finish moving tomorrow.  My son has been staying with me most of the last year, is staying with me now, and she will be staying with me for two weeks until they’re resettled about two miles away.  That’s a far cry from two years ago when both were thousands of miles away, a big step up for my son, who is attending a very good high school worthy of his mind, and we’re in an area that affords her with a good-paying job.

My point is that I believe the verse about “what God has joined together, let no one separate” applies as much to the couple as it does to others.  Again, although I am by no means perfect, I have always kept plugging away at trying to make things work, if not for a marriage, then at least for our family.

Getting back to how God sees things, I think Hillary Clinton is an exceptional liar, second only to Obama and Satan himself.  Although they fit many of the criteria, I am not convinced that either of them are the dragon, the beast, the second beast, or the great prostitute (Revelations 13 and 17).

They are behaving, however, in a striking Biblical semblance, and it is behavior that we scientists look at most sincerely.

Obama’s Citizenship – Revisited

Thousand’s of people have questioned Obama’s Citizenship, and for good reason:  It remains so full of holes that it makes the Titanic look like the U.S.S. Enterprise.  I submit to you that Obama’s Citizenship is nothing less than the greatest fraud perpetrated on the American people, if not the World in general, EVER:
1. There’s an abundance of evidence that he was born in Kenya. This evidence includes a period-accurate birth certificate whose marks and signatures have been verified to the nth degree, recorded statements by both Michelle and Barack himself that he was born in Kenya, long before either of them felt like they had to watch their words, along with dozens of corroborting pieces of evidence supporting the same. To date, all legal efforts to prove this as fact have been tossed, not on the basis of the evidence itself, but on the basis of oft-contrived and quite sketchy “rules of procedure” or “jurisdiction.” It’s amazing the long reach of even a fake president’s arm when the DoJ remains loyal and under his purview, eh?
2. The only scrap of evidence that he was born is Hawaii was a single document coughed up by a hospital in Hawaii two full years after Obama invaded the White House. Unlike all other copies of birth certificates from the early 1960’s, including my own, as delivered by all 50 of these United States, Obama’s “copy” wasn’t a copy at all. Instead, it was a document which White House officials purported to be real, but one which countless experts with Adobe Photoshop and other professional digital editing software proved beyond any shadow of a down was nothing more than a manufactured fake. Even so, someone had to sign it, and someone did, but she was amazingly the only non-survivor of a shallow-water ditching of a Cessna Caravan where all the other survivors, including the pilot and co-pilot, survived without a scratch. Setup? Did she take a fall? Oh, hell yeah, on both accounts, God rest her soul. The handwriting is all over the God-damned wall.  Hell, Obama’s own legal team disavowed the birth certificate they produced in one of the court cases.
3. Then there’s the matter of Obama’s school records, which someone or some organization paid well over a million dollars to seal against public scrutiny. Nevertheless, countless pictures have surfaced that he was a loser, a number of scholastic testimonies have surfaced that he was never a “Constitutional scholar” as he falsely claimed, and documented evidence has surfaced that he was registered as “Barry Soetoro,” a foreign student from Indonesia who was receiving funding based on the fact that he really was a foreign student from Indonesia. He certainly wasn’t born in Indonesia, however. He was born in Kenya. After he was born, his mother transported him to Hawaii where he was raised by his mom and his grandparents for a while, before his mother transported him to Indonesia, where he attended mosque on a regular basis, learning the Islamic faith along with Arabic and many key passages of the Qur’an.
4. At no time has Obama or anyone else ever produced any attempt by Obama to become a naturalized citizen, and the U.S. Social Security Administration has zero record of Obama’s naturalization.
5. Meanwhile, Obama has at various points in time, put forth at least two, and possible three social security numbers, only one of which has ever been confirmed by the Social Security Administration as his, but then, only at a late date, under suspicious circumstances, apparently under false pretenses, and therefore highly supect.
To date, no one has provided ANY credible evidence to the contrary, whereas liberal judges controlled by the Demoncraps and/or Obama’s power strings from on high have shut down all legal efforts to expose Obama’s many lies.
Regardless of his legal status, his REALITY status remains in very high question among many Americans.
In my professional opinion, Obama remains a Kenyan, not an American citizen, and has therefore never been a lawful U.S. President, ergo, 100% of all executive orders, treaties, international agreements, appointments and legislative approvals are fully null and void, never to be recognized, much less observed, or far worse, enforced.
If you believe otherwise, you’re either a blithering idiot or you’re not an American.

Obama’s Picks for Scalia’s Replacement

Ok, let’s take a look at Obama’s potential picks to replace Scalia:
1. Sri Srinivasan:
a. DISQUALIFIED! (partisanship) In 2013, he was part of the legal team that presented arguments before the Supreme Court against the Defense of Marriage Act in the case of United States v. Windsor.
b. DISQUALIFIED! (partisanship) Earlier in his career, he also performed pro bono work for presidential candidate Al Gore during the aftermath of the 2000 presidential election.
2. Merrick Garland:
a. DISQUALIFIED! (partisanship) Garland was a member of the Harvard Law Review, same rag as Obama, and in the same position. Nothing but another Obama crony.
b. DISQUALIFIED! (partisanship) On September 6, 1995, President Bill Clinton nominated Garland to the D.C. Circuit.
3. Paul J. Watford:
a. DISQUALIFIED! (partisanship) On October 17, 2011, President Obama nominated Watford to a seat on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
b. DISQUALIFIED! (great disagreement on his qualifications) On February 2, 2012, the Judiciary Committee reported Watford’s nomination to the floor of the Senate by a vote of ten ayes to six nays.
c. DISQUALIFIED! (great disagreement on his qualifications) The Senate confirmed Watford on May 21, 2012 in a 61–34 vote; he received his commission on May 22, 2012. Note this was prior to the conservative domination of the Senate during the 2014 elections. It’s highly doubtful he would be confirmed for his current position today, must less the Supreme Court.
Sorry, Obama, but your picks are about as blatantly slanted towards Demoncrap party shenigans and away from Constitutional honest as one can get.
The answer from We the People is NO.

The Blithering Idiocy of the Liberal Left

Jeffery Stone and Chris Cohron are blitheringly idiot Demoncrap liberal retards.   Just read the following for a minute and think about what he’s saying as compared to what he thinks he’s saying:
Libtard ExtraordinairreFor the sake of argument, let’s use his severely gross lack of logic to point out just how incredibly and mindbogglingly stupid these ass hats really are:
Every man is a potential active rapist…
Every driver on the road is a potential active vehicular manslaughterer…
Everyone who has ever used a kitchen knife to cut vegetables is a potential active Jack the Ripper…
Every homeowner who has ever spread fertilizer on his lawn is a potential active mass-murdering bomber…
Every airlines pilot is a potential active kamikaze dive-bomber and skyscraper demolition expert…
Every cop is a potential active murdering abuser of authority…
Everyone with access to a stone, brick, hammer, shovel or cast iron pan is a potential active skull-bashing thug…
The purpose of this exercise is to demonstrate how incredibly shallow these Jar-Jars really are, the fact that they couldn’t think their way out of a paper bag if their lives depended on it, that they are completely void of any and all common sense, utterly incapable of even the most rudimentary trains of logic or rational reason.
And yet they want you to vote for equally liberal Hillary? That speaks volumes about her complete and total incompetence, as well.

Obama, the Global War on Terror, Violent Extremism, and the U.S. Constitution

Recent headlines proclaim:

Obama Facing Jail Time After It’s Proven He Paid Ransom Funding Terrorists

Is this true?  Has Obama finally run smack into the concrete wall known as the U.S. Constitution?
Let’s find out…
The United States Constitution states: “Treason against the United States, shall consist only in levying War against them, or in adhering to their Enemies, giving them Aid and Comfort.”
If Obama gave terrorists money, it would certainly appear that he committed treason.  The problem with this approach, however, rests in what is meant by the Constitution’s use of “Enemies” and how our government views it in their eyes.
For example, on May 23, 2013, Obama declared the global war on terror is over. Specifically, he said, “We must define our effort not as a boundless ‘Global War on Terror,’ but rather as a series of persistent, targeted efforts to dismantle specific networks of violent extremists that threaten America.”
In so doing, Obama no longer believes (if he ever believed) that terrorists are our enemies. Specifically, he no longer believes that Islamic terrorists are our enemies. Instead, Obama believes that “violent extremists” are our enemies.  Sadly, half of Congress shares his opinion.  But what are “violent extremists?  A quick look at the Department of Homeland Security’s website reveals the following statement:

Violent Extremism

Violent extremists are defined as “individuals who support or commit ideologically-motivated violence to further political goals.” Violent Extremist threats within the United States can come from a range of violent extremist groups and individuals, including Domestic Terrorists and Homegrown Violent Extremists (HVEs). DHviolent extremismS defines Domestic Terrorism as:  Any act of violence that is dangerous to human life or potentially destructive of critical infrastructure or key resources committed by a group or individual based and operating entirely within the United States or its territories without direction or inspiration from a foreign terrorist group.
The statement in red is particularly troubling as it directly contradicts both state and federal law, not to mention the U.S. Constitution, that allows citizens to use deadly force to protect life, limb, and property.  It’s a typical progressive attempt at stopping violence by putting a daisy into the end of the enemy’s gun.  Sorry to disappoint the idealistic idiots out there, but that has never worked throughout the entirety of human history, nor will it.  Ever.  At best, it is mind-blowingly stupid.  At worst, it’s a death sentence to any population that starts ascribing to it in appreciable numbers.
Moreover, the White House’s own website contains an ominous 2011 report entitled, “Empowering Local Partners to Prevent violent extremism Violent Extremism in the United States.”  Although he mentioned al-Qa’ida and its affiliates in the preface (written before ISIL/ISIS/IS reared its ugly head), Obama also states:
Actions and statements that cast suspicion toward entire communities, promote hatred and division, and send messages to certain Americans that they are somehow less American because of their faith or how they look, reinforce violent extremist propaganda and feed the sense of disenchantment and disenfranchisement that may spur violent extremist radicalization.
The problem with this statement is that as nice as it sounds, it’s no longer directed towards al-Qa’ida.  It’s aimed squarely at any patriotic American who agrees with our Founding Father’s reason for creating the Second Amendment, as clearly stated in the text itself:  “…necessary to the security of a free state…”  Put simply, Obama classifies anyone who dares to use deadly force to protect their rights and freedoms as “violent extremists.”  He even said so in the next section:
Protecting our fundamental rights and liberties is an important end in itself, and also helps counter violent extremism by ensuring nonviolent means for addressing policy concerns…
What Obama fails to realize is that “nonviolent means” do not work with people who are hell-bent on trying to kill you.  He also fails to realize that criminalizing the Constitutional use of deadly force by honest, law-abiding citizens is not only NOT the answer, it may very well be the ONLY solution.
In conclusion, it does indeed appear that by declaring the global war on terror to be “dead,” he was hoping to change the technical categorization of the Muslim Brotherhood and other known terrorist organizations from “enemy” to “whatever.”
In so doing, Obama was trying to skirt a charge of treason.
Fortunately, our country has a long history of “piercing the corporate veil.”  The courts don’t take kindly to those who attempt to escape the law on mere technicalities, and We the People take an even dimmer view of it, particularly when such individuals were elected to the public trust.  I, for one, will push for my Congressman to consider the acts of each and every group to which Obama funneled public dollars, deciding on their own merit whether or not these groups acted as enemies of the United States, particularly if they declared the U.S. as their enemy, and most certainly if they declared themselves at war with the U.S.  If this proves to be the case, as it most certainly appears, then Obama most certainly did, in fact, commit treason as described by the U.S. Constitution, and he should most certainly be brought to justice for his crimes.