A liberal recently challenged me: “You claim to have evidence, but did you witness the fraud with your own eyes?”
My response: Does your doctor see your heart beating? Does he witness the color of your blood? Or does he observe the machine measuring your BP, pulse and O2 levels? Do you know you’re not exceeding the speed limit or do you look at your speedometer? I served my country for 20 years as a Navigator in the U.S. Air Force, primarily by observing and acting upon a wide variety of numbers. In business, we’re taught to crunch the numbers. Statistics is all about proper analysis of the numbers.
Analyzing the numbers from each state on an hour by hour basis is sufficient to determine the possibility of election fraud, and statistical elimination of all possible combinations of independent contributing factors, all of which are also statistically measurable, is sufficient to confirm election fraud.
Just as a 1970 factory-new Cessna 172 will never reach 200 KIAS in level flight or climb at a steady rate of 5,000 feet per minute — numerically measurable entities — so too the candidate-specific proportionality of returns in an election cannot veer more sharply from one hour to the next than the weighted-average sum of all independent contributing factors affecting those proportions such as ballot source (mail-in vs polls or by precinct).
The infamous hockey pick wasn’t observed in those states where President Trump had a clean win, and it wasn’t observed in those states where Vice President Biden had a clean win.
It WAS, however, observed in those states where the returns swung from clear Trump victories before 9 PM into wins for Biden i.e. those states committing election fraud.
The proportional disparity between Trump and Biden voters with respect to absentee/mail-in ballots vs voting in person is not enough to explain it.
The proportional disparity between Trump and Biden voters with respect to the time-based returns by district is not enough to explain it.
The combination of the two is not enough to explain it.
No other explanation has been proposed by liberals and/or Democrats, or mainstream media to explain it.
Three things explain the observed time-phased proportional returns quite well:
- Election officials unlawfully kicking out or distancing conservative observers. They didn’t get everyone, however, hence the 700+ sworn affidavits of election fraud filed by observers after the election.
- Election officials unlawfully running multiple stacks of Biden-only or even mostly-Biden ballots through the counters multiple times during the first few hours of November 4, 2020.
- Election officials unlawfully adding boxes of pre-filled, fraudulent ballots to the hoppers during the first few hours of November 3, 2020.
- An unlawful, coordinated effort between election officials in these states, as evidenced by the same hockey-stick swing in the data beginning during the same hour and only in the contested states.
I am not a professional statistician. I am, however, a data analyst and I do use statistics. I’ve taken one full year of statistics in my undergraduate degree in Finance, and I’ve taken three more statistics courses in my graduate degrees.
I observed statistical anomalies in all of the following states: AZ, FL, GA, IA, MI, MN, NC, NV, OH, PA, TX, WI. Of these, I firmly believe, based on my own statistical observations, that President Trump won FL, GA, IA, MI, NC, NV, OH, PA, TX and WI fair and square, and any subsequent findings to the contrary are solely due to the commission of election fraud.
It doesn’t take a statistician to observe that had no election fraud occurred, given the states listed above, President Trump would have taken the lion’s share of electoral votes and would remain in the White House while leading our nation to victory today.