Todd Starnes asked what his readers thought about the election. Specifically:
OPINION: Franklin Graham says he tends to agree with President Trump – that the election was either stolen or rigged. What say you, America?Starnes, T. (December 21, 2020). Franklin Graham: I tend to believe election was rigged or stolen. Retrieved from: https://www.toddstarnes.com/politics/franklin-graham-i-tend-to-believe-election-was-rigged-or-stolen/
My response: Both rigged and stolen.
I was one of several thousand statisticians observing the elections. Specifically, I focused on Michigan, as an inside source had informed me the Dems had prepared hundreds of thousands of fake ballots for Biden in case it appeared Trump would win as he had in 2016.
I chose to compare proportions between time frames, taking snapshots of the tally in Michigan every hour, subtracting the totals taken the previous hour to determine votes added during each successive hour.
I observed the first 80% of all ballot returns steadily had President Trump in a 5.8% lead, whereas the last 20% of all ballot returns steadily had Biden in a 24.7% lead. While this may seem possible, though improbable on the face of it, when you crunch the numbers, a teenager has a greater probability of reaching the Moon using nothing but his skateboard.
The change wasn’t gradual. It was sharp, with Trump’s lead holding all day and past midnight, before sharply switching towards Biden, a trend which continued for the remaining 20% of all ballot returns.
Specifically, between the first 80% and last 20% of ballot returns, there was a sharp 28.8% drop in ballot proportions for Trump along with a sharp 32.3% increase in ballot proportions for Biden. The net change in spread from Trump to Biden between the first 80% and the last 20% was 30.5%.
Moreover the percentage difference in the spread between proportions was a whopping 61.1%, a statistically impossible feat.
To date, Michigan has only offered two excuses:
1. The change occurred when we stopped counting ballots from the polls and began counting mail-in ballots.
2. The change occurred due to differences in candidate preference between precincts.
Again, while this may seem possible, though improbable on the face of it, when you crunch the numbers, Evil Knievel has a greater probability of jumping the length (not the breadth) of the Grand Canyon on a pedaled tricycle.
First, these two excuses are mutually exclusive, as mail ballots from all over the state were counted at the same time, and after the ballots were counted from the polls, thereby precluding the inclusion of precinct-weighted ballots during the last 20% of ballots. Since mail ballots covered the entire state randomly, they would have reflected the same overall proportions of Michigan preferences. Thus, the last 20% of the ballots were, absolutely NOT the result of precinct preferences.
Second, the difference in proportions between mail-in ballots vs ballots received from the polls was minor, roughly 7%. That explains less than one-third of the 30.5% swing.
Various Demoncrap pundits will claim, “but the election results show the mail-in vs polls discrepancy was far larger,” but they’re wrong, and here’s WHY they’re wrong: They’re using the finally tallies in an attempt to prove there was no fraud. The logical fallacy is this: The final tallies include the error introduced by election fraud. In fact, the final tallies reflect the entire election fraud. This fallacy is a bit like trying to claim you’re airline luggage can’t possibly be overweight because it is the weight it is, when in fact, it’s 17.2 lbs — 34.4% — over the 50 lb limit.
Using the final tally as a means of determining actual proportions, whether by precinct or by voting location (polls vs mail-in) ONLY works if there’s ZERO fraud. Any amount of fraud taints those numbers by the amount of fraud that exists.
The only way to accurately determine candidate proportions v. voting location is by independent, third-party polling. While election polling has proven to be considerably off, by upwards of 30% in some cases, it’s generally accurate to without 12%.
It has NEVER been off by 435%, which is the massive amount of “error” required to explain away these discrepancies. No. Absolutely not.
Independent, third-party polling of voters was not off by 435%. The ONLY explanation for the results of this time-phased proportional analysis is ballot-dumping, ballot-skimming, or a combination thereof.
Ballot-dumping occurs when election offices introduce fake ballots into the election stream. There are three ways this can be done:1. Dropping fake physical ballots into the ballot que before counting.2. Running a single batch of ballots with altered proportions through the counter multiple times.3. Mechanically or electronically altering the ballot counting machines or system.
There is absolutely zero doubt along with absolutely irrefutable evidence that Michigan committed voter fraud and certified their fraudulent results. As Michigan knew there would likely be an investigation if Biden won, I suspect the vast majority of their election fraud consisted of manufacturing several hundred thousand, if not more than a million, fake pro-Biden ballots to be added to the hoppers if it looked like Biden needed a bit of fraudulent help in stealing Michigan’s 16 electoral votes.
As it turns out, Michigan election officials determined Biden needed roughly 340,084 ballots worth of help. This is the discrepancy between
IN FACT, accounting for all factors, including differences between precincts as well as the 7% reduction in Trump mail-in ballots as compared to Biden, the FINAL TALLY in a CLEAN Michigan election would have been 51.99% for Trump and 46.30% for Biden for a spread of 5.68% in Trump’s favor.
Seriously: The reduction from 5.78% in the first 80% of the ballot returns to 5.68% in the last 20% of ballot returns represents the ENTIRE statistically probably 7% shift due to mail-in ballots for the last 20% of returns.
Quite simply, this is reality.
Michigan perpetrated FRAUD against its own citizens AND the rest of the entire country.
To answer Todd Starnes’ original question: Michigan definitely rigged their own election, committing fraud throughout, including the moment they certified their election results, which supports the accusation of “stolen.” Moreover, while I did not conduct a strict analysis of the results from other states, I nevertheless see irrefutable signs of election fraud in the results of 11 other states, and to such an extent that for all intents and purposes, President Trump most certainly won the 2020 elections by a landslide.
But, oh, hey… MORE EVIDENCE:
I could fill up 100 web pages with links to countless collections of the EVIDENCE of 2020 ELECTION FRAUD. This glob isn’t about proving all claims. It’s to counter all the claims of “What evidence? There’s no evidence” with “open your eyes, morons.”
Now… If President Trump and the State of Texas can just see i.e. accurately observe what the Supreme Court wrote in their response and correct their filings by perfecting their arguments involving STANDING, we all just might achieve justice through the Supreme Court after all.
Let me make this abundantly clear: TEXAS HAS STANDING. They simply failed to establish their standing in their filing.
I’ll even include a quote from the Texas Has Standing article:
While reading through the docket of the U.S. Supreme Court, in particular the 35 motions filed by Texas, 17 additional states, and both supporting and detracting entities, I observed two things:
- Texas does indeed have standing commensurate with U.S. Law.
- The U.S. Supreme Court did NOT rule that Texas didn’t have standing. Rather, they only ruled that Texas did not demonstrate their standing.
Solution: File an amendment to the original filing, this time with proper verbiage clearly demonstrating standing.
SCOTUS DID NOT REJECT THE CASE. The only reason they chose not to hear it is because Texas failed to establish STANDING.
Establish standing, and you will be heard!
Finally, Governor Mike Huckabee has asked that we share this from Newt Gingrich:
“I’ve been active in this since 1958; that’s 62 years. I’m the angriest I have been in that entire six decades. You have a group of corrupt people who have absolute contempt for the American people, who believe that we’re so spineless, so cowardly, so unwilling to stand up for ourselves that they can steal the presidency, and we’ll wring our hands, bring in a few lawyers, and do nothing.
“My hope is that President Trump will lead the millions of Americans who understand exactly what’s going on: [that] the Philadelphia machine is corrupt, that the Atlanta machine is corrupt, the machine in Detroit is corrupt, and they’re trying to steal the presidency, and we should not allow them to do that.
“First of all, we should lock up the people who are breaking the law. You stop someone from being an observer –- you just broke federal law. You hide and put up paper so nobody can see what you’re doing –- you just broke federal law. You bring in ballots that aren’t real –- you just broke federal law.
“I am sick and tired of corrupt left-wing Democrats who believe that we are too timid and too easy to intimidate, and therefore they’ll just go out and steal it. You are watching an effort to steal the presidency of the United States, and this is not about Donald Trump. This is about the American people, [who] have the right, in an honest election, with honest, legitimate ballots, to pick their leader. Or are we now just sheep, to be dominated by the high-tech businesses, the news media, and the various political machines?
“This is a crisis in the American system, comparable to Washington on Christmas Eve or Lincoln at Gettysburg. This is a genuine, deep crisis of our survival.”
Gingrich said that in any precinct in which Republicans were not able to observe, the votes should be taken back –- “strip those votes out, do not count them, because they’re by definition corrupt.”
The following is a clear presentation by data scientists as to how and WHY Georgia’s elections were HIGHLY fraudulent:
Please note that failure to revert the final tally to their rightful and lawfully-earned candidate constitutes complicity, not merely of election fraud, but of an attempted coup, a treasonable offense punishable by life in prison, and in serious circumstances, the death penalty.