Obama Voters – Treason or Stupidity?

After reviewing the Constitution’s definition of treason (Article III, Section 3), as well as Obama’s record of treasonous acts against the United States of America alongside the tenets of Complicity Law, I realized there is only one legal, sane, rational conclusion to be reached, here:
Those who voted for Obama are either complicit in his treason or they’re sublimely stupid, in which case they shouldn’t be voting at all.

There’s no middle ground, here, people!  No wiggle room.  All possible categories can be boiled down to the following five:

  1. You were fully cognizant of Obama’s treason and voted for him anyway, in which case you were fully complicit in his treason.
  2. You were somewhat aware of Obama’s treason but voted for him anyway, in which case you were at least partially complicit in his treason, but you were also either lazy, stupid, treasonous yourself (or some combination thereof) because you were somewhat aware that something nefarious was afoot yet you failed to exercise your due diligence as a voter to determine whether Obama had committed treason or not.
  3. You weren’t aware of Obama’s treason, in which case you were undoubtedly either voting for him for no other reason than he was a Democrat, black, or both (willfully ignorant), and/or you were drinking the liberal Kool-Aid* of the mainstream media (unknowingly being kept ignorant).  Regardless, either way you were completely and utterly stupid.
*”Drinking the Kool-Aid” refers to the 1978 Jonestown Massacre, where the phrase suggests that one has mindlessly adopted the dogma of a group or leader without fully understanding the ramifications or implications.
At this point, one might ask, “Is it really treason to knowingly vote for someone who committed treason?

ABSOLUTELY.
Here’s why:
“Treason against the United States, shall consist only in levying War against them, or in adhering to their Enemies, giving them Aid and Comfort.” – Article III, Section 3, U.S. Constitution
Thus, if someone joins ISIS or al Qaeda, fighting alongside them against U.S. troops, that’s treason.
When someone holds fast to, gives support, or maintains loyalty to an enemy of America, that’s “adhering.”  That’s treason.
When someone provides “beans and bullets,” logistical support (transportation), intelligence (spying), or refuge, that’s “aid and comfort.”  That’s treason.
But what about when a person doesn’t directly engage in these activities themselves, but merely votes for a treasonous person or supports them monetarily or in some other way?
Great question!  Let’s look at what the law has to say about this:
 
Complicity in criminal law refers to when someone is legally accountable, or liable for a criminal offense, based upon the behavior of another. Criminal complicity may arise in the following situations.  With the intent to promote or assist the commission of the offense:
 
1. a person procures, induces or causes such other person to commit the offense; or
 
2. a person aids or abets such other person in committing the offense; or
 
3. having a legal duty to prevent the commission of the offense, a person fails to make an effort he is legally required to make.
As you review both the U.S. Constitution’s definition of treason and Complicity law side by side, you will see that the Constitution included complicity in it’s definition.  In fact, the Constitution contains three phrases of treason in its definition, yet only the first one addresses open acts of war or aggression against the United States.  The second and third phrases directly address complicity, those things people do to help America’s enemies.  Thus, “the supreme Law of the Land” considers complicity in a citizen to be just as much treason as when a citizen levies war against the United States itself.
Let’s review these three elements of complicity one by one to see what such acts of complicity might entail:
1. a person procures, induces or causes such other person to commit the offense; or
The Democrat Party procured Obama as a candidate.  Either they, George Soros, corrupt politicians, or some combination thereof induced or otherwise caused Obama to commit his many acts of treason, either monetarily, by means of party pressure, offering political “guidance,” feeding him incorrect information, exchanging political favors, or providing promises of some future reward.  Regardless of the means, Obama remains fully guilty of all offenses of treason.
2. a person aids or abets such other person in committing the offense; or
 
This category includes all Obama voters, along with those who made contributions to the Democrat party or Obama’s election in the form of money or value, and even the hourly efforts of those who worked in various party offices, organized meetings, created Obama buttons, or campaigned door to door.  But it also includes those who carried out Obama’s orders, knowing they violated the U.S. Constitution.
3. having a legal duty to prevent the commission of the offense, a person fails to make an effort he is legally required to make.
Most of Congress falls into this gaping hole.   I say “most,” because nearly all Democrats fell lock-step behind Obama in his many illegal and sometimes treasonous actions.  Furthermore, a number of Republicans did, as well.  As such, they are equally guilty of treason.   On top of that, every aid, administrative assistant, attorney, cabinet head, and White House staffer who blinked and did nothing to stop Obama’s treasonous actions is complicit.  This is really where the oath of office comes into play.  When a military, law enforcement, or civilian officer (executive, legislative, judicial) agrees to “solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same…” they are committing themselves, their persons, to one of the highest and most noble causes in our nation, to serve our country.  The oath of office isn’t a formality.  It forms the cornerstone of our duty, our loyalty to our nation above and beyond any loyalty to anyone or anything else.
Since complicity requires “intent to promote or assist the commission of the offense,” the ONLY defense under complicity law against treason for those who voted for Obama involves being too STUPID to know what he was up to.
However, there’s no such defense under the United States Constitution, as it doesn’t differentiate between “knowingly” and “unknowingly.”  It assumes, and rightly so, that this is serious enough stuff that people aren’t going to take it lightly, that they’re going to exercise caution and due diligence to make dang sure they don’t cross the line.  Only someone who is either knowingly complicit or really stupid would ever cross that line, hence the reason why I use the term “Demoncraps.”  If they were knowingly complicit in Obama’s treason, then they’re demonically opposed to the United States.  If the were just too stupid to know the difference…
Demonically opposed + stupid as shit = Demoncraps

Obamites Try Saving Obama’s Sinking Legacy

A blithering idiot recently said, “Last I checked, Obama did not bankrupt our country… We are not in a recession… We have strong job growth… and we have lower oil prices…. but yeah we have to constantly hear racist remarks, hes muslim, hes a terrorist… We are a LOT BETTER than we were in January 20 2009.”
Doubling the national debt from $9 trillion to more than $19 trillion constitutes bankruptcy. That happened THROUGHOUT Obama’s administration. That IS Obama’s legacy, along with countless other political and social gaffs that have resurrected racial tensions throughout America from their 1970s ashes, hobbled economic growth, and greatly harmed our nation as a whole.  Those of you who believe otherwise are living in a dream world, one measured not by facts, rational thought, sound reasoning and good judgement, but by how sweet-sounding you can make your idiotic rhetoric sound to one another.  You are, in every Biblical sense of the definition, fools.  You cannot save Obama’s sinking legacy with the same rhetoric that doomed you from the start.
 
We are NOT better than we were back in January 20,2009. In fact, we were poised to exit a relatively minor recession very quickly. Obama’s blitheringly idiotic and rather Keynesian economic policies GREATLY prolonged our recovery by filtering the people’s money via taxes through the highly inefficient and grossly sub-par rate of return (about 70% below the break-even point of 1.0) instead of allowing the people to keep those funds and use them as they saw fit, rebuilding their businesses, paying rent – whatever was needed. Those funds, injected directly into the economy by millions of consumers making good, economic choices right for them has always had a FAR greater and more positive effect on the nation’s economy as a whole than ANY government funded program, much less a government-funded “recovery.”
 
In fact, your comment underscores the primary problem of Demoncraps and Libtards: You always claim every positive thing as a victory for your cause without having the SLIGHTEST freaking clue as to its source, much less the nature of cause an effect. I’ll bet if you found a penny in the street, you’d say, “Thanks, Obama!” but if you stepped in poo you’d blame it on Bush and Trump.” It’s idiots like you that got us into our current and horrific brink of disaster mess by voting for other idiots like Obama and the Demoncrap half of Congress who haven’t the slightest clue about economics, much less how to turn a nation a strong world competitor-partner.
 
I don’t know of a nicer way to put it than to say, “You Demoncraps and libtards suck. You don’t have slightest clue as to what you’re talking about or what you’re doing. You’ve made a horrible mess of things, and anything positive that’s happened over the last eight years has occurred IN SPITE OF your idiotic gyrations, not because of them. It’s time for you to SHUT UP and use the next eight years to study REALITY for a change. You tried idealism, and look where it got us? Yeah. So shut up, already.”
 
Meanwhile, the economy — including both the stock market as well as a huge influx of new jobs — surged away from Obama’s sinking legacy immediately AFTER Trump won. Obama’s fudged low unemployment FAILS to count any of the unprecedented number (>50%) of non-employed workers throughout the United States. Read up on the BLS website for U1-U6. None of them count workers who have given up working for jobs, often moving in with friends or family, because there are no jobs or other options. NOW we have jobs. NOW they have options. AFTER Obama, in the TRUMP era.
 
No, Trump is no God. He’s certainly not perfect, either. But as a highly successful multi-corporate Chief Executive Officer, Trump has repeatedly demonstrated he has what it takes — including the smarts — to lead the Chief Executive Office of these United States by hiring the right collection of experts who are not cronies and who stand the greatest probability of actually fixing many of America’s many problems.
You had your chance with Obama.  He blew it.
It’s our turn, and if you would please, children, get and keep your God-damned fingers out of the pie.
In the meantime, here’s a little history lesson for the blithering idiots:

“Back in the 1960s and 1970s, Milton Friedman challenged the Keynesians over how monetary policy works. (John Maynard Keynes was dead, so did not directly argue the point.) Keynesians viewed stimulative monetary policy as helping the economy through lower interest rates, which increased spending by consumers and businesses.

“Friedman’s masterpiece study A Monetary History of the United States, 1867-1960 convinced him that they driver was money supply growth rather than interest rates.

“Friedman won the battle, and monetary policy was accepted by most economists as a money supply matter. During the recent recession, however some younger members of the profession [including Obama and his advisors] rediscovered old-fashioned Keynesianism.”

Source:  Conerly, B. (2012).  Keynes vs. Friedman at the Fed.  Forbes.  Retrieved from:  http://www.forbes.com/sites/billconerly/2012/03/08/keynes-vs-friedman-at-the-fed/#47d57e6016e4

Obama, ISIS and ISIL

Whenever Obama says “ISIL” he is doing it as a face-slap to Israel.
 
The “L” in ISIL stands for “Levant” which is an ancient term for the entire area, including Palestine and Israel. Because he is aligned with ISIS, he will NEVER say “ISIS.” It will always be “ISIL”.
 
FYI: “The Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant (ISIL), also known as the Islamic State of Iraq and Syria (ISIS), Islamic State (IS), and by its Arabic language acronym Daesh, is a Salafi jihadist unrecognized state and militant group that follows a fundamentalist, Wahhabi doctrine of Sunni Islam. Its adoption of the name Islamic State and its idea of a caliphate have been widely criticized, with the United Nations, various governments, and mainstream Muslim groups rejecting its statehood.”
 
Also: “The Levant is an approximate historical geographical term referring to a large area in the eastern Mediterranean. In its widest historical sense, the Levant included all of the eastern Mediterranean with its islands, that is, it included all of the countries along the eastern Mediterranean shores, extending from Greece to Cyrenaica.”
 
Put simply, the Levant includes the following countries and regions:
– Cyprus
– Israel
– Iraq
– Jordan
– Lebanon
– Palestine
– Syria
– Turkey
 
The area includes a myriad of languages:
– Levantine Arabic
– Hebrew
– Aramaic
– Armenian
– Circassian
– Greek
– Kurdish
– Ladino
– Turkish
 
By continuing to use the term “ISIL,” Obama and the Mudstream Idia (Idiotic Media) is intentionally recognizing the claim ISIS makes over the entire Levant, rather than merely Iraq and Syria (ISIS).
 
When you get to the crux of the matter, Obama is backing the claim of ISIS over Israel, something NO Christian would EVER do.
 
Obama is NOT a Christian. He may not be Satan incarnate, but he’s certainly one of his deceived minions.

Obama, Hillary, and the Demoncrap Party: Revelations’ Number of the Beast?

My Friend, methinks you’re not understanding the nature of the situation.
 
Many competent psychologists have stepped forward, examined the empirical evidence, including her many statements, her testimony before Congress, the e-mails she sent from her own personal/private account, various paperwork. and eyewitness testimony of many who’ve been in her immediate presence for extended periods of time on numerous occasions, and have come to precisely the same conclusion as have many astute observers in the general public: She is a pathological liar, involving the “falsification entirely disproportionate to any discernible end in view, may be extensive and very complicated, and may manifest over a period of years or even a lifetime. The individual may be aware they are lying, or may believe they are telling the truth.”
 
By “empirical evidence,” I am referring to “the knowledge or source of knowledge acquired by means of the senses, particularly by observation and experimentation. Empirical evidence is information that justifies a belief in the truth or falsity of a claim. In the empiricist view, one can claim to have knowledge only when one has a true belief based on empirical evidence. This stands in contrast to the rationalist view under which reason or reflection alone is considered evidence for the truth or falsity of some propositions. The senses are the primary source of empirical evidence. Although other sources of evidence, such as memory and the testimony of others, ultimately trace back to some sensory experience, they are considered secondary, or indirect. In science, empirical evidence is required for a hypothesis to gain acceptance in the scientific community. Normally, this validation is achieved by the scientific method of hypothesis commitment, experimental design, peer review, adversarial review, reproduction of results, conference presentation, and journal publication. This requires rigorous communication of hypothesis (usually expressed in mathematics), experimental constraints and controls (expressed necessarily in terms of standard experimental apparatus), and a common understanding of measurement.”
 
So you see, My Friend, no small amount of examination of Hillary Clinton has been accomplished in these experts coming forth and attesting to the fact that she is indeed a pathological liar.
 
The fact that she has lied a very great deal to both Congress and the American public was clearly established by testimony of FBI Director Comey, not only in the midst of his press release that while regretably not recommending charges, but thankfully clearly citing at least some of Hillary’s many criminal actions, but more appropriately in subsequent and sworn testimony before Congress wherein he absolutely and without question highlighted Hillary’s great and many lies.
 
The thing about operations of this magnitude, however, is that even far smaller operations leave trails of both information and money, and such trails tell an unambiguous story not only of lies, but of cheating and stealing an incredible sum of $5.1 BILLION from the American people, hundreds of millions of which were routed to the Clintons’ pockets via the Clinton Foundation and Clinton Global Initiative, almost always in exchange for highly questionable if not outright illegal political favors given to those who were either paying exorbitant sums ($750,000) for their speeches or “contributing” to their money-laundering “organizations.”
https://youtu.be/rmMe-2qaSss
 
The handwriting isn’t merely on the wall (Daniel 5), My Friend. The paint is now three feet thick, sagging, and bleeding under its own weight. Yet “The god of this age has blinded the minds of unbelievers, so that they cannot see the light of the gospel that displays the glory of Christ, who is the image of God.” – 2 Cor 4:4
 
In the old days this was limited to simple matters, such as the Gospel itself, along with the nature and role of the Pharisees, Sadducees, and principalities and powers of this world. But Satan has so convoluted the issues that the minds of many of the elect (saved by grace through faith) have also been deceived, not about the light of the gospel, but about seriously and severe involvement in demonic forces.
 
The litmus test is simple: Put away all all preconceived notions of all parties and ask this one simple question: Who is lying? Who is lying to the American people? Who lied to the FBI? Who lied to Congress? Who was fired from the Watergate investigations because of her gross ethical violations? Who has a forty year long track record of lying, lying, lying, lying, lying?
 
What does God hate? It’s lying lips (Proverbs 12:22: “The LORD detests lying lips, but he delights in people who are trustworthy.”) and lying tongues (Proverbs 12:19: “Truthful lips endure forever, but a lying tongue lasts only a moment.”)
 
The question is, am I trustworthy? I’d like to think so. I was saved by grace, through faith in Jesus Christ my Lord and Savior when I was 15 years old in a Baptist Church in Slidell, Louisiana. I’d been attending church and youth groups at a Presbyterian church off and on for several years, but I’d never heard a clear presentation of the Gospel of Jesus Christ. When I did that one summer afternoon, the Holy Spirit confirmed in my heart that the testimony I was hearing from many others was true and from God Almighty.  Although my conversion is real, I willingly admit I am no Billy Graham.  Although I tried to be the best husband and father I could be, I was not.  Although I never violated the marriage bed, I struggled in other areas.  Although I always sought to lead and love my son in the path of our Lord and Savior Jesus Christ, it has often been in ways that were more worldly than saintly.

I know that.  They know that.  And although I am no longer married to the love of my life and mother of our child, we remain good friends.  I am helping her finish moving tomorrow.  My son has been staying with me most of the last year, is staying with me now, and she will be staying with me for two weeks until they’re resettled about two miles away.  That’s a far cry from two years ago when both were thousands of miles away, a big step up for my son, who is attending a very good high school worthy of his mind, and we’re in an area that affords her with a good-paying job.

My point is that I believe the verse about “what God has joined together, let no one separate” applies as much to the couple as it does to others.  Again, although I am by no means perfect, I have always kept plugging away at trying to make things work, if not for a marriage, then at least for our family.

Getting back to how God sees things, I think Hillary Clinton is an exceptional liar, second only to Obama and Satan himself.  Although they fit many of the criteria, I am not convinced that either of them are the dragon, the beast, the second beast, or the great prostitute (Revelations 13 and 17).

They are behaving, however, in a striking Biblical semblance, and it is behavior that we scientists look at most sincerely.

Obama’s Citizenship – Revisited

Thousand’s of people have questioned Obama’s Citizenship, and for good reason:  It remains so full of holes that it makes the Titanic look like the U.S.S. Enterprise.  I submit to you that Obama’s Citizenship is nothing less than the greatest fraud perpetrated on the American people, if not the World in general, EVER:
1. There’s an abundance of evidence that he was born in Kenya. This evidence includes a period-accurate birth certificate whose marks and signatures have been verified to the nth degree, recorded statements by both Michelle and Barack himself that he was born in Kenya, long before either of them felt like they had to watch their words, along with dozens of corroborting pieces of evidence supporting the same. To date, all legal efforts to prove this as fact have been tossed, not on the basis of the evidence itself, but on the basis of oft-contrived and quite sketchy “rules of procedure” or “jurisdiction.” It’s amazing the long reach of even a fake president’s arm when the DoJ remains loyal and under his purview, eh?
 
2. The only scrap of evidence that he was born is Hawaii was a single document coughed up by a hospital in Hawaii two full years after Obama invaded the White House. Unlike all other copies of birth certificates from the early 1960’s, including my own, as delivered by all 50 of these United States, Obama’s “copy” wasn’t a copy at all. Instead, it was a document which White House officials purported to be real, but one which countless experts with Adobe Photoshop and other professional digital editing software proved beyond any shadow of a down was nothing more than a manufactured fake. Even so, someone had to sign it, and someone did, but she was amazingly the only non-survivor of a shallow-water ditching of a Cessna Caravan where all the other survivors, including the pilot and co-pilot, survived without a scratch. Setup? Did she take a fall? Oh, hell yeah, on both accounts, God rest her soul. The handwriting is all over the God-damned wall.  Hell, Obama’s own legal team disavowed the birth certificate they produced in one of the court cases.
 
3. Then there’s the matter of Obama’s school records, which someone or some organization paid well over a million dollars to seal against public scrutiny. Nevertheless, countless pictures have surfaced that he was a loser, a number of scholastic testimonies have surfaced that he was never a “Constitutional scholar” as he falsely claimed, and documented evidence has surfaced that he was registered as “Barry Soetoro,” a foreign student from Indonesia who was receiving funding based on the fact that he really was a foreign student from Indonesia. He certainly wasn’t born in Indonesia, however. He was born in Kenya. After he was born, his mother transported him to Hawaii where he was raised by his mom and his grandparents for a while, before his mother transported him to Indonesia, where he attended mosque on a regular basis, learning the Islamic faith along with Arabic and many key passages of the Qur’an.
 
4. At no time has Obama or anyone else ever produced any attempt by Obama to become a naturalized citizen, and the U.S. Social Security Administration has zero record of Obama’s naturalization.
 
5. Meanwhile, Obama has at various points in time, put forth at least two, and possible three social security numbers, only one of which has ever been confirmed by the Social Security Administration as his, but then, only at a late date, under suspicious circumstances, apparently under false pretenses, and therefore highly supect.
 
To date, no one has provided ANY credible evidence to the contrary, whereas liberal judges controlled by the Demoncraps and/or Obama’s power strings from on high have shut down all legal efforts to expose Obama’s many lies.
 
Regardless of his legal status, his REALITY status remains in very high question among many Americans.
 
In my professional opinion, Obama remains a Kenyan, not an American citizen, and has therefore never been a lawful U.S. President, ergo, 100% of all executive orders, treaties, international agreements, appointments and legislative approvals are fully null and void, never to be recognized, much less observed, or far worse, enforced.
 
If you believe otherwise, you’re either a blithering idiot or you’re not an American.

Obama’s Picks for Scalia’s Replacement

Ok, let’s take a look at Obama’s potential picks to replace Scalia:
 
1. Sri Srinivasan:
 
a. DISQUALIFIED! (partisanship) In 2013, he was part of the legal team that presented arguments before the Supreme Court against the Defense of Marriage Act in the case of United States v. Windsor.
 
b. DISQUALIFIED! (partisanship) Earlier in his career, he also performed pro bono work for presidential candidate Al Gore during the aftermath of the 2000 presidential election.
 
2. Merrick Garland:
 
a. DISQUALIFIED! (partisanship) Garland was a member of the Harvard Law Review, same rag as Obama, and in the same position. Nothing but another Obama crony.
 
b. DISQUALIFIED! (partisanship) On September 6, 1995, President Bill Clinton nominated Garland to the D.C. Circuit.
 
3. Paul J. Watford:
 
a. DISQUALIFIED! (partisanship) On October 17, 2011, President Obama nominated Watford to a seat on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
 
b. DISQUALIFIED! (great disagreement on his qualifications) On February 2, 2012, the Judiciary Committee reported Watford’s nomination to the floor of the Senate by a vote of ten ayes to six nays.
 
c. DISQUALIFIED! (great disagreement on his qualifications) The Senate confirmed Watford on May 21, 2012 in a 61–34 vote; he received his commission on May 22, 2012. Note this was prior to the conservative domination of the Senate during the 2014 elections. It’s highly doubtful he would be confirmed for his current position today, must less the Supreme Court.
 
Sorry, Obama, but your picks are about as blatantly slanted towards Demoncrap party shenigans and away from Constitutional honest as one can get.
 
The answer from We the People is NO.

The Blithering Idiocy of the Liberal Left

Jeffery Stone and Chris Cohron are blitheringly idiot Demoncrap liberal retards.   Just read the following for a minute and think about what he’s saying as compared to what he thinks he’s saying:
Libtard ExtraordinairreFor the sake of argument, let’s use his severely gross lack of logic to point out just how incredibly and mindbogglingly stupid these ass hats really are:
 
Every man is a potential active rapist…
 
Every driver on the road is a potential active vehicular manslaughterer…
 
Everyone who has ever used a kitchen knife to cut vegetables is a potential active Jack the Ripper…
 
Every homeowner who has ever spread fertilizer on his lawn is a potential active mass-murdering bomber…
 
Every airlines pilot is a potential active kamikaze dive-bomber and skyscraper demolition expert…
 
Every cop is a potential active murdering abuser of authority…
 
Everyone with access to a stone, brick, hammer, shovel or cast iron pan is a potential active skull-bashing thug…
 
The purpose of this exercise is to demonstrate how incredibly shallow these Jar-Jars really are, the fact that they couldn’t think their way out of a paper bag if their lives depended on it, that they are completely void of any and all common sense, utterly incapable of even the most rudimentary trains of logic or rational reason.
 
And yet they want you to vote for equally liberal Hillary? That speaks volumes about her complete and total incompetence, as well.