Obama Voters – Treason or Stupidity?

After reviewing the Constitution’s definition of treason (Article III, Section 3), as well as Obama’s record of treasonous acts against the United States of America alongside the tenets of Complicity Law, I realized there is only one legal, sane, rational conclusion to be reached, here:
Those who voted for Obama are either complicit in his treason or they’re sublimely stupid, in which case they shouldn’t be voting at all.

There’s no middle ground, here, people!  No wiggle room.  All possible categories can be boiled down to the following five:

  1. You were fully cognizant of Obama’s treason and voted for him anyway, in which case you were fully complicit in his treason.
  2. You were somewhat aware of Obama’s treason but voted for him anyway, in which case you were at least partially complicit in his treason, but you were also either lazy, stupid, treasonous yourself (or some combination thereof) because you were somewhat aware that something nefarious was afoot yet you failed to exercise your due diligence as a voter to determine whether Obama had committed treason or not.
  3. You weren’t aware of Obama’s treason, in which case you were undoubtedly either voting for him for no other reason than he was a Democrat, black, or both (willfully ignorant), and/or you were drinking the liberal Kool-Aid* of the mainstream media (unknowingly being kept ignorant).  Regardless, either way you were completely and utterly stupid.
*”Drinking the Kool-Aid” refers to the 1978 Jonestown Massacre, where the phrase suggests that one has mindlessly adopted the dogma of a group or leader without fully understanding the ramifications or implications.
At this point, one might ask, “Is it really treason to knowingly vote for someone who committed treason?

ABSOLUTELY.
Here’s why:
“Treason against the United States, shall consist only in levying War against them, or in adhering to their Enemies, giving them Aid and Comfort.” – Article III, Section 3, U.S. Constitution
Thus, if someone joins ISIS or al Qaeda, fighting alongside them against U.S. troops, that’s treason.
When someone holds fast to, gives support, or maintains loyalty to an enemy of America, that’s “adhering.”  That’s treason.
When someone provides “beans and bullets,” logistical support (transportation), intelligence (spying), or refuge, that’s “aid and comfort.”  That’s treason.
But what about when a person doesn’t directly engage in these activities themselves, but merely votes for a treasonous person or supports them monetarily or in some other way?
Great question!  Let’s look at what the law has to say about this:
 
Complicity in criminal law refers to when someone is legally accountable, or liable for a criminal offense, based upon the behavior of another. Criminal complicity may arise in the following situations.  With the intent to promote or assist the commission of the offense:
 
1. a person procures, induces or causes such other person to commit the offense; or
 
2. a person aids or abets such other person in committing the offense; or
 
3. having a legal duty to prevent the commission of the offense, a person fails to make an effort he is legally required to make.
As you review both the U.S. Constitution’s definition of treason and Complicity law side by side, you will see that the Constitution included complicity in it’s definition.  In fact, the Constitution contains three phrases of treason in its definition, yet only the first one addresses open acts of war or aggression against the United States.  The second and third phrases directly address complicity, those things people do to help America’s enemies.  Thus, “the supreme Law of the Land” considers complicity in a citizen to be just as much treason as when a citizen levies war against the United States itself.
Let’s review these three elements of complicity one by one to see what such acts of complicity might entail:
1. a person procures, induces or causes such other person to commit the offense; or
The Democrat Party procured Obama as a candidate.  Either they, George Soros, corrupt politicians, or some combination thereof induced or otherwise caused Obama to commit his many acts of treason, either monetarily, by means of party pressure, offering political “guidance,” feeding him incorrect information, exchanging political favors, or providing promises of some future reward.  Regardless of the means, Obama remains fully guilty of all offenses of treason.
2. a person aids or abets such other person in committing the offense; or
 
This category includes all Obama voters, along with those who made contributions to the Democrat party or Obama’s election in the form of money or value, and even the hourly efforts of those who worked in various party offices, organized meetings, created Obama buttons, or campaigned door to door.  But it also includes those who carried out Obama’s orders, knowing they violated the U.S. Constitution.
3. having a legal duty to prevent the commission of the offense, a person fails to make an effort he is legally required to make.
Most of Congress falls into this gaping hole.   I say “most,” because nearly all Democrats fell lock-step behind Obama in his many illegal and sometimes treasonous actions.  Furthermore, a number of Republicans did, as well.  As such, they are equally guilty of treason.   On top of that, every aid, administrative assistant, attorney, cabinet head, and White House staffer who blinked and did nothing to stop Obama’s treasonous actions is complicit.  This is really where the oath of office comes into play.  When a military, law enforcement, or civilian officer (executive, legislative, judicial) agrees to “solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same…” they are committing themselves, their persons, to one of the highest and most noble causes in our nation, to serve our country.  The oath of office isn’t a formality.  It forms the cornerstone of our duty, our loyalty to our nation above and beyond any loyalty to anyone or anything else.
Since complicity requires “intent to promote or assist the commission of the offense,” the ONLY defense under complicity law against treason for those who voted for Obama involves being too STUPID to know what he was up to.
However, there’s no such defense under the United States Constitution, as it doesn’t differentiate between “knowingly” and “unknowingly.”  It assumes, and rightly so, that this is serious enough stuff that people aren’t going to take it lightly, that they’re going to exercise caution and due diligence to make dang sure they don’t cross the line.  Only someone who is either knowingly complicit or really stupid would ever cross that line, hence the reason why I use the term “Demoncraps.”  If they were knowingly complicit in Obama’s treason, then they’re demonically opposed to the United States.  If the were just too stupid to know the difference…
Demonically opposed + stupid as shit = Demoncraps

Islamic Terrorism, and Snakes on a Plane

“Enough is ENOUGH!  I have had it with these motherfucking [Islamic terrorism] snakes on this motherfucking plane!  Everybody strap in.  I’m about to open some fucking windows.”

Neville Flynn, Snakes on a Plane

“The Islamic State Group claimed responsibility for the attack via their Amaq News Agency.  Catalan Police have confirmed the incident is a terror attack.” – Source
 
Many people worldwide think it’s long past time time to implement a new 1,000 to 1 policy for Islamic terrorism. If Islamic terrorism kills 12 innocent civilians, the People of this World will summarily execute 12,000 people associated with Islamic terrorism, beginning with that terrorist’s immediate and extended family, spreading throughout the Islamic terrorism cell, to any and all known and related Islamic terrorism cells within that Islamic terrorism organization. If the 12,000 number has not yet been reached, move on, beginning with known terrorist cells of the same religion, and so on.
 
You might want to start at Gitmo, or did Obama release ALL of those Islamic terrorism prisoners back into their fight against the U.S.?
 
Seriously. After dealing with this Islamic terrorism crap for 1,400 years, it has become abundantly clear the only way to eradicate Islamic terrorism from the human gene pool is to kill them all, then burn their books, papers, mosques, homes, villages, and even entire cities to the ground, into rubble.
 
Just to be “fair,” though, we ought to give them “fair warning:” At the very next attack even remotely attributable to Islamic terrorism, we WILL nuke ONE city randomly chosen from all cities throughout the entire world containing two-thirds or more Muslims and containing a population within the top one-third of all such cities. At the SECOND terrorist attack even remotely attributable to Islamic terrorism, we WILL nuke FORTY such cities, including Mecca. At the THIRD terrorist attack even remotely attributable to Islamic terrorism, we WILL nuke ALL cities throughout the world containing more than two-thirds Muslims, starting with the most populated and continuing down the list until an official Islamic delegation promises the world that there will NEVER be another Islamic terrorist attack anywhere in the world EVER again, or until the list is complete.  Should the promise be broken with another attack even remotely attributable to Islamic terrorism, we WILL continue down that list.
 
I think our world would be MUCH better off with a little more radiation than continuing to suffer incessant attacks and threats of attacks at the hands of Islamic terrorism.
 
While this sounds drastic, evidently God himself thought precisely the same thing when he commanded the jews to kill everyone in certain tribes:
 
“In 1 Samuel 15:2-3, God commanded Saul and the Israelites, “This is what the LORD Almighty says: ‘I will punish the Amalekites for what they did to Israel when they waylaid them as they came up from Egypt. Now go, attack the Amalekites and totally destroy everything that belongs to them. Do not spare them; put to death men and women, children and infants, cattle and sheep, camels and donkeys.’ ” “
 
God ordered similar things when the Israelites were invading the promised land (Deuteronomy 2:34; 3:6; 20:16-18).
 
Why would God have the Israelites exterminate an entire group of people, women and children included?
 
Unlike us, God knows the future. God knew what the results would be if Israel did not completely eradicate the Amalekites. If Israel did not carry out God’s orders, the Amalekites would come back to trouble the Israelites in the future.
 
Saul claimed to have killed everyone but the Amalekite king Agag (1 Samuel 15:20). Obviously, Saul was lying—just a couple of decades later, there were enough Amalekites to take David and his men’s families captive (1 Samuel 30:1-2). After David and his men attacked the Amalekites and rescued their families, 400 Amalekites escaped.
 
If Saul had fulfilled what God had commanded him, this never would have occurred.
 
Several hundred years later, a descendant of Agag, Haman, tried to have the entire Jewish people exterminated (see the book of Esther). So, Saul’s incomplete obedience almost resulted in Israel’s destruction. God knew this would occur, so He ordered the extermination of the Amalekites ahead of time.
 
By the way, “Haman’s lineage is given in the Targum Sheni as follows: “Haman the son of Hammedatha the Agagite, son of Srach, son of Buza, son of Iphlotas, son of Dyosef, son of Dyosim, son of Prome, son of Ma’dei, son of Bla’akan, son of Intimros, son of Haridom, son of Sh’gar, son of Nigar, son of Farmashta, son of Vayezatha, (son of Agag, son of Sumkei,) son of Amalek, son of the concubine of Eliphaz, firstborn son of Esau”.
 
if you’re interested in learning from whom the Arabs in Persia (Iraq) and Medes (Iran) descended, please check out this Family of Esau map, complete with links to each of the dozens of progenitors and descendants.
 
Do you think it’s time to finish the job?  If so, write your governmental representatives and make you thoughts known.  Demand action!
 

LGBTQ – Should We ‘Live and Let Live’ or Should We Stand Firm?

A friend of mine stated this morning on Facebook, “As for the LGBTQ crowd, I have a ‘Live and Let Live’ policy.  We all should follow that.”
I’m sorry, my friend, but I follow God of the Bible, and Jesus Christ, who showed us the way. In particular, with the adulteress at the well, he loved her (saved her from being stoned to death, no less!), but he did not allow her to persist in her sin: “Go, and sin no more.” Our Bible: “Male and female he made them,” yet the LGBTQ crowd wants us to believe there are a dozen or more genders? Phooey. I do not accept that because God’s word says that’s false.  It also says homosexuality is a sin, an “abomination before the Lord” in Romans chapter 1, clear as day.  Unless, apparently, you’re blinded by sin.
 
I accept the Bible.
 
Along with the Bible, I also accept the Constitution: “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof…”
 
In highlighting and denouncing the sins of this small segment of society who demands that We the People pay for their elective medical care, I am freely exercising my religion, one which God’s word clearly indicates what we all are to do:
 
“In the first four chapters of 1 Corinthians, Paul introduces a shameful problem in the church. The Corinthians proudly attach themselves to certain leaders, whose teaching seems to disclose a “wisdom” not known or taught by other teachers, and certainly not by Paul or his fellow-apostles. These cliques and factions are undermining the unity of the church and are a denial of the gospel of Jesus Christ. In chapters 5 and 6, Paul calls attention to two other problems plaguing the church: immorality and lawsuits.
 
“Chapter 5 is not actually about the immorality of one church member, as much as it is about the pride and passivity of the entire church in response to this sinner. It is not until the end of chapter 6 (verses 12-20) that Paul exposes the evil of immorality.”
 
“Live and let live” is a secular — and sinful — approach to the problem, which is the fact that that the LGBTQ group not only wants everyone to adopt the “live and let live” mentality towards them, but they want us to believe that it’s somehow good.
 
It is not good. Adultery is not good. LGBTQ is not good. Abortion is not good. Murder is not good. They are ALL SIN.  Not only does the Bible state, “hate that which is evil; cling to that which is good,” but I refuse to allow my tax dollars to pay for evil i.e. their indulgence in sin.
 
“Live and let live?” Phooey! That’s how Rome fell. I worked too hard supporting and defending my Constitution against all enemies foreign and domestic to allow America to fall to either class of enemies, especially while being being aided and abetted by foolish Americans who are suckered into a “live and let live” attitude, much less an, “Oh, let’s help them!” attitude.
 
No.
 
True, this is America, and people are free to sin against themselves and god it they want to, even with other consenting adults. If they want to engage in evil, then they can damned well create pools of funds out of their own pockets to pay for their sin, but I’ll be damned if I’m going to allow them to further their evil with my tax dollars or parade their sin around our nation’s public schools as “good” when God Himself says “sin is evil.”
 
That’s not only foolishness, but it’s how countries fall, how they are rotted from within.
 
Not on my watch.

How DARE Senator Bennet (CO) Send Me Such Flagrant LIES!

I’m going to let Senator Michael Bennet tell the story in his own delusional words.  Here’s his e-mail I received today, July 28, 2017, along with my interleaved comments in red:

Friends,

In a 49-51 vote early this morning, the United States Senate narrowly rejected the Republicans’ latest attempt to repeal the Affordable Care Act.

It should have never been this close.

You’re right.  It should have been 100-0 defeating the worst piece of legislation to ever have been considered in the halls of Congress.  In fact, in this article, The Balance utterly refutes the false claims of Obamacare (the Affordable (NOT) Health Care Act or “ACA”).  The Balance are home to experts who are here to deliver clear, practical advice to help everyone strengthen their lifelong relationship with money so you can earn more, spend smarter, invest well, and build a more secure future.

After seven years of campaigning to repeal the Affordable Care Act, Majority Leader Mitch McConnell forced a vote at 1:30 in the morning, on a bill he introduced only a few hours earlier. He did so without a single hearing to discuss its contents and provide bipartisan input. The process was a disgrace, but the substance was worse.

Strange, Senator Bennet, but for a moment there I thought you were talking about the way your own party shoved Obamacare down America’s throat.  In fact, it’s because of your own underhanded violations that Forbes published this rather enlightening article on the nefarious beginnings of Obamacare.

The last version of the bill would have caused 16 million Americans to lose their health coverage, increased premiums by 20 percent, and plunged the insurance market into turmoil.

Again, Senator Bennet, this is precisely what happened when Obamacare was introduced, forcing people into doing things the government has absolutely ZERO business doing, skyrocketing premiums, plunging the insurance market into turmoil, and forcing tens of millions of people to give up their insurance altogether and pay the fine because Obamacare is WAY too expensive.

This is a far cry from President Trump’s repeated promise of a “terrific” plan that would “cover everyone” at a “small fraction of the cost.”

YOUR Senate came up with this plan, Senator Bennet.  Not President Trump.  Why are you blaming him, again?

In recent weeks, it has become clear that President Trump and Leader McConnell’s only goal was to pass something, anything — regardless of how much it harmed millions of Americans.

YOUR Senate came up with this plan, Senator Bennet.  Not President Trump.  Why are you blaming him, again?

There is no shortage of cynicism in Washington, but this surely ranks near the top. Our country deserves better from its representatives.

Yes, it does, Senator Bennet.  In fact, Colorado deserves WAY better than this incredibly deceptive letter from you.  Here’s an idea:  Let’s vote you OUT of office so we don’t have to put up with your sort of LIES ever again, and replace you with a conservative like we did with Cory Gardner.  How’s that for an idea?

To those who spoke out in recent days, thank you. It made the difference. Your voices helped save health care for millions of Americans.

Yet another LIE from your desk.  The voice of We the People have been speaking out AGAINST (64%) Obamacare for eight years, and that includes in recent weeks.  Obamacare was only preserved because of traitors like McCain and 24 other Republican turncoats VIOLATING the will of We the People.

The fight isn’t over. Our task now is to chart a better course: to abandon political gamesmanship and come together to fix health care so it is more accessible, affordable, and better for families.

Damned straight the fight’s not over, but before we can get healthcare OUT of the hand of the government, we need to get self-serving LIARS like Senator Bennet OUT of the government.

Regardless of whether you support the Affordable Care Act or oppose it, most Coloradans are deeply dissatisfied with our health care system.

No shit, Sherlock, but were NOT “deeply dissatisfied” prior to having the ACA monstrosity known as Obamacare shoved down their throats.

They know it needs major reforms to lower costs, expand coverage, and increase choice. They deserve a health care system worthy of their decency and befitting the wealthiest and most innovative nation on Earth.

We the People know that when we get government OUT of the healthcare business, then the business market will return to its competitive self, re-establishing the low, competitive rates that were acceptable to the market as a whole.

In the days ahead, as we continue with health care and take up tax reform, stay engaged. Don’t accept the dysfunction. Demand that your leaders reflect your decency and common-sense. Insist that they tackle our nation’s challenges with the seriousness they deserve.

I hereby demand you read my remarks in red above, and take quick, positive action by RESIGNING from office, you incompetent, lying HACK.

We can do this if we work together.

Thank you,

Michael

And thank you, Senator Bennet, for continuing to ruin the United States of America by sticking fast with Demoncrap Party nonsense instead of DOING YOUR HOMEWORK and realizing that the Demoncrap Party’s tack on this and many other issues is just that:  Nonsense.

When You’re Attacked…

I cannot identify this particular incident without giving away certain privacy act information.
Here’s what I can say about it:  Whilst I and the rest of my high school youth group were singing songs unto the Lord, a PCP-hopped (VA police revealed evidence) slammed open doors, literally flipped tables from floor level to some 12 foot height and more than 17 feet beyond (I measured it).
Prior to that point, we were all kind of, “Wha…”
We watched as he entered our circle, shouting all sorts of crap against “you people playing your Christian songs,”that he’d had enough, etc.

He had already entered the large worship room, and all of us were on the defensive. We railed against him forcibly entering the room.  Some of us wrestled him to the ground.  Some of us secured the group to hidden corners.  Some of us interacted with 911 services.

ALL of us dealt with this, and while interesting, it was NOT FUN.  So, let’s LEARN from it so that the likelihood of this ever happening again is SO less likely that

Grace People:   Please send your recollections to me.  Thanks.

I will soon publish a conglomerate in a mini-book form, and will make it available to all, provided all parties agree do it, including the perp himself, under Virginia state law.

Otherwise, it will remain a mostly secret based on obscure references.

Here’s a thought, Grace people, let’s stop this crap in the bud.  I was there, helped wrestled this offender to the ground, called 911 repeatedly to elicit help, helped move most people to our churches hidden chambers…

Why haven’t I had a say in this guy’s court hearings?

I was there.  I saw and experienced everything.

 – Steve
Forrest:  (enters the room)…  Pick it up from there..

I’m writing a book, so if you have input, I want to hear from you.

 
Somewhere in Northern Virginia, there was a Christian Youth Fellowship organization…

America’s Greatest Terrorism Threats

According to a Princeton Study using FBI data and reported by GlobalResearch, Islam is not our greatest terrorism threat. Rather, the left-wing extremists surpass that threat by a factor of FOUR.
American Terrorism
 
Meanwhile, right-wing extremists don’t even appear on the chart. People like certain actors who say, “I’m fearful of people with guns!” need to keep that in mind, especially while living in Latino-dense Southern California.  Their terrorist threat level is nearly double that of left-wing extremists, and SEVEN TIMES higher than Islamic extremists.
left-wing terrorism
 The “terrorist threat” from right-wing extremists has to be less than that of the lowest group listed on the chart: Communists. Call it 4%, although it’s probably lower than that.  Even at 4%, however, it’s still SIX TIMES lower than that of left-wing extremists, and more than TEN TIMES lower than that of Latinos.
 
Please present these findings to the next blitheringly idiotic left-wing “journalist” who claims that “right-wingers are our biggest threat.”
 
Our only threat to the left is on intellectual and factual bases.
 
Hey, don’t shoot the messenger. I didn’t gather the data. The FBI did. Nor did I conduct the study. Princeton University did.  Have a nice day.

Getting in Shape

I’ve been getting back into cycling. Last week, I finally repaired my flat, bought new tires and tubes, and trued my wheels. Last night I gave my trusty steed a decent, long-overdue, and much-needed cleaning. 🙂
 
In the last week, I’ve done a very short but moderately steep 1-mile trip, along with a longer 2-mile trip.
 
I’m feeling better after each trip!
 
I’m planning on a 13.4 miler tomorrow morning. That may be a bit aggressive for where I am right now, as I’m still running into the breathing side of cardio as my limfac (limiting factor).
 
As the human body regains fitness, it usually encounters shortness of breath as the first sign of a serious lack of fitness. I’ve been there, done that, and overcame it. Unfortunately, I’m back there again. 🙁
 
By limiting dietary intake to healthy foods (lots of water, zero processed foods, zero sugar, balanced carbs and proteins, and healthy fats), while exercising at one’s limerfac (see Note 1, below), one can get move from the shortness of breath limerfac to the cardio or lactic acid limerfac between about one and three weeks.
 
During the shortness of breath, one is seriously out of shape. You climb a long slope of stairs or even a gentle hill and find yourself out of breath. You should by all means consult your doctor if you find yourself at this stage, especially if you’re NOT obese or even carrying around more than a few extra pounds, as it could indicate a serious underlying health condition that no amount of exercise will cure.
 
If medically cleared, as you progress in your twice-daily (see Note 2, below) cardio routine, 4-5 times per week (see Note 3, below), you will quickly find yourself recovering your ability to breath while exercising. Between one and three weeks on this regimen, you will no longer be out of breath, but will begin running up against either heart rate or lactic acid buildup as your limerfacs. If you’ve been out of shape for a while, and you’re performing both a good, five to ten-minute warming and slow but steadily progressively more intense you’ll usually hit a heart rate maximum before you encounter a lactic acid maximum during this phase. If you’ve been out of shape for a short time, you might find yourself hitting a lactic acid ceiling, instead.
 
Either way, the good news is that you’re “over the hump.” You’re now in shape to… get in shape. I know this sounds backwards, but, quite literally, when you’re out of shape, you’re in a slow but steady downward spiral. No amount of medication, rest, diet, nutrition, or whatever is going to get you over that hump.
 

Speaking of which, strength training doesn’t involve a “hump.” Progressive training with weights might feel like there’s a “hump” involved, but it’s often due to the fact that weightlifters are on a tight enough schedule so as to experience “aerobic weight lifting,” wherein they progress between stations at a rate fast enough to stimulate their aerobic conditioning response.

ACR.  That’s MY term, not anyone else’s.  Yes, I’ve read the books.  No, I’m not an “exercise physiologist.”  I am well aware, however, that many of the studies leading into the modern acceptance of what’s “fit” involved test subjects who were well below today’s 50th percentile in terms of BMI.  In fact, the early studies weren’t out to test obesity, much less various fitness levels thereof.  Instead, they were out to test minimum, normal (statistically speaking) and maximum levels of performance for a particular height and weight range involving what had previously been determined as being acceptable for test pilots.

Here’s the truth:  Back as early as the 1930s, we began minimizing human weights in the testing and calculations in order to achieve the best results.  I’m not going to bore you with the immediately verifiable results of 90 years of research, experimentation, and results, but the fact remains:  Small females can withstand more G’s while remaining capable over longer periods of time of tracking more targets and eliminating the same than even the most prolific “HOO-RAH!” male.

We’re not talking about hand-to-hand-combat, here.  We’re talking about tapping into our own genetic structure which evolution has selected what works best to preserve the outcome, and why.

In the case of female pilots, well, they really rock shit.  Better multitasking (but only somewhat), Greater G-force resistance (but only somewhat).

If some God appointed me the general extraordinaire, with an edict that all freedom-hating groups be extinguished as soon as possible…

Well… Damned.  That’s tough.

However, here’s what I’d do:

Send all aviators to combat the threat (regardless of gender – they signed up and trained, etc. – this issue was buried in the 1990s, or so I thought).

 
one will progress through shortness of breath as the limiting exertion factor, then max heart rate, and finally, lactic acid. With dedication, riding hard for half an hour at least every other day while, it only takes a week or two for you to transition between shortness of breath to heart rate as your limiting exertion factor.
 
We’ll see how I feel at the 5 mile point. That’s up a steep hill, down a mild hill, and up another mild hill. Easy ride home from there.
 
If I feel fine, plenty of energy and wind, I’ll continue for a loop around Garden of the Gods. Once I begin that, however, I’m committed, as I’ll have to add down a steep hill, up a very steep hill, down a steep hill, and up a steep hill, along with 8.4 miles to my distance.